Arizona State University Gender and Sexuality Privilege Reflections This activity is to be a reflective and reflexive application of course content by each
Arizona State University Gender and Sexuality Privilege Reflections This activity is to be a reflective and reflexive application of course content by each student considering her/his personal conception of stratification, in terms of social status and of identity.
Using Kimmel and Ferber (Eds.), Privilege: A Reader, students will utilize the Discussion Questions and Activities
Reflection One: Journal Questions 1-5; Personal Connections A and C, pages 64-66.
For maximum earnings, the terms/concepts ideas addressed in the discussion questions should be integrated in your responses. Submissions should have reflection identified in the submission.
Final
***Attachments are a copy of the pages and grading rubric*** Grading Rubric for Critical Reviews and Essays
For each prepared response, you may earn points for each response based on the criteria below (a
percentage of what is possible; note that percentages accumulate). What you earn will be based on the
percentage that you have completed and met the criteria. That is, your earning will be based on the extent
of your inclusion of these items in your response. The percentages indicate that you included that item
and the ones above it.
You did not submit the exercise (no credit).
You submitted the exercise, yet it was not presented utilizing word processing. (You may earn 20%
maximum)
Exercise was submitted, yet consistent style guides (APA or ASA preferred) were not followed. (You
may earn 40% maximum).
Responses are complete, yet lack coherence all items and questions have been addressed but are
disorganized and not logical. (You may earn 60% maximum)
Responses are at critical thinking levels indicated below:
Level 1: Elementary clarification is provided; information is there without elaboration. Surface
information is provided and statements are made without justification that is, reference citations. (You
may earn 70% maximum)
Level 2: In-depth clarification is provided as evident by analysis that looks at assumptions as well as
findings. Additional information is provided or suggested but without explanation. (You may earn
between 80 and 90% maximum)
Level 3: Inferences are made and conclusions are based on evidence from prior statements; generalizing
is evident by use of examples. In-depth information is provided and substantiated with citation or other
reference. (You may earn 100%
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
