UMES Communicating Negotiating & Resolving Conflicts Across Cultures Paper According to the paper “Communicating, Negotiating, and Resolving Conflicts Acro

UMES Communicating Negotiating & Resolving Conflicts Across Cultures Paper According to the paper “Communicating, Negotiating, and Resolving Conflicts Across Cultures” there are four phases in negotiation processes: Building a relationshipExchanging informationTrying to persuade each otherMaking Concessions and reaching agreement Read a mini case in the given paper (Page 100) “When is it time do Business?” and who, in your opinion, is at fault here? 2. How would Bill Miller amend his negotiation style if he had known about different phases of negotiation? 3. How would a culturally intelligent Mexican behave if s/he was in the position of Juan Alvarez? rP
os
t
BK0005
CHAPTER FIVE
op
yo
August 1, 2009
Communicating, Negotiating, and
Resolving Conflicts Across Cultures
From Cultural Intelligence: Living and Working Globally,
Do
No
tC
Second Edition, by David C. Thomas and Kerr Inkson
© 2009 by David C. Thomas and Kerr Inkson. All rights reserved.
Published by Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Harvard Business Publishing distributes in digital form the individual chapters from a wide selection of books on business from
publishers including Harvard Business Press and numerous other companies. To order copies or request permission to
reproduce materials, call 1-800-545-7685 or go to http://www.hbsp.harvard.edu. No part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, used in a spreadsheet, or transmitted in any form or by any means – electronic,
mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise – without the permission of Harvard Business Publishing, which is an
affiliate of Harvard Business School.
This document is authorized for use only by Kamalesh Panthi until March 2013. Copying or posting is an
infringement of copyright. Permissions@hbsp.harvard.edu or 617.783.7860.
rP
os
t
op
yo
tC
No
Do
This document is authorized for use only by Kamalesh Panthi until March 2013. Copying or posting is an
infringement of copyright. Permissions@hbsp.harvard.edu or 617.783.7860.
rP
os
t
CHA P TER
5
op
yo
Communicating,
Negotiating, and Resolving
Conflicts across Cultures
CO M M U N I C AT I O N FA I LU R E
Consider these four vignettes of cross-cultural living, all of them
authentic experiences involving Americans.1
An Australian woman, flying aboard Sky West Airlines from
Atlanta to Pittsburgh, asks a flight attendant if she can have
a pack of pretzels instead of crackers. When the attendant
says they don’t have any pretzels, she replies, ‘’Fair dinkum?’’
But before the Australian can say anything more, a second attendant asks for her passport and copies down her name. Her
local colloquialism has sparked a security scare, her common
Australian phrase apparently being misinterpreted as an act of
aggression.
Do
No
tC
?
?
An American student shares a dormitory room with a Thai. They
get on well. Then, after they have lived together for several
weeks, the Thai abruptly announces that he has applied for a
transfer to another room. The American is surprised and upset
and asks the Thai why he wants to move. The Thai is reluctant
to speak but eventually says that he can’t stand the American’s
noisiness, loud stereo, late visitors, and untidiness. The American
is even more surprised: all this is new to him. “Couldn’t you have
84
BK-ThomasInkson-2nd_ed-CS3-ToPress2.indd 84
7/17/2009 9:52:40 AM
This document is authorized for use only by Kamalesh Panthi until March 2013. Copying or posting is an
infringement of copyright. Permissions@hbsp.harvard.edu or 617.783.7860.
rP
os
t
told me this sooner?” he says. “Maybe I could have done something about it.”
An American economist is on a study tour in China. He visits an
economic planning institute where a Chinese economist, who is
interested in the American’s economic forecasting techniques,
invites him to spend two months in China giving seminars. The
American is very interested in the offer, and says so, but he adds
that he has to check with the administration of his U.S. institute to
get their approval. Back in the United States, he is granted the
necessary clearance and sends a message to China indicating
that he is definitely available. But the Chinese never contact him
again.
tC
?
A newly qualified American community counselor is assigned as
a client a Malaysian man who suffers from low energy and poor
concentration. In their first interview, the Malaysian is very quiet
and withdrawn. The counselor is used to silences in counseling
sessions, as clients reflect and analyze, but this client does not
seem to want to communicate at all. So the counselor takes time
to try to persuade him of the nature of the counseling process.
At the end of the session, the client does not seek any further
counseling. The counselor is disappointed: he has learned almost nothing about his client. Has he done something wrong?
op
yo
?
Do
No
These cases, to which we will return later, demonstrate communication failures that led to the breakdown of relationships, and all have cultural origins.
Communication—the interchange of messages between
people—is the fundamental building block of social experience. Whether selling, buying, negotiating, leading, or working with others, we communicate. And although the idea
of communicating a message seems simple and straightforward—“You just tell it straight. And you listen.”—when it
comes to figuring out what goes wrong in life, “communication failure” is by far the most common explanation.
Communication operates through codes—systems of signs
in which each sign signifies a particular idea. Communication
Communicating, Negotiating, and Resolving Conflicts
BK-ThomasInkson-2nd_ed-CS3-ToPress2.indd 85
85
7/17/2009 9:52:40 AM
This document is authorized for use only by Kamalesh Panthi until March 2013. Copying or posting is an
infringement of copyright. Permissions@hbsp.harvard.edu or 617.783.7860.
rP
os
t
?
In the first case the expression “fair dinkum” is a common Australian phrase that is used to refer to something worthwhile or reliable. As a question, it can mean
“Really? Is that right?” and this is most likely the sense in
which the passenger used it. However this term was not
in the vocabulary of the American flight attendants. And
they drew a wrong conclusion. This is an example of different codes.
In the case of the student whose Thai friend moved out,
culture and custom interfered with communication. In
their upbringing, Americans are encouraged to be active,
assertive, and open, and to expect the same in others. In
their upbringing, Thais are encouraged to be passive and
sensitive, and they too expect the same in others. The
Thai expected the American to be sensitive to his feelings;
the American expected the Thai to say what his feelings
were. When neither behaved as expected, the relationship
broke down. This is an example of different conventions.
tC
?
op
yo
also uses conventions—agreed-upon norms about how, when,
and in what context codes will be used. If two people do not
share the same codes and conventions, they will have difficulty communicating with each other. And codes and conventions are determined mainly by people’s cultures. The most
obvious example of unshared codes is different languages.
Each communication breakdown in our opening set of
vignettes can be explained in terms of cultural differences:
The counselor whose client wouldn’t talk failed to appreciate the meaning of an important part of the communication—the silences! Silences are not always absence
of communication; they are often part of communication. Asians tend to wait longer than Westerners before
speaking, especially to authority figures. To some extent
long silences are a sign of respect. The counselor might
have been more patient. Also, the Malaysian may not
have been assertive enough to seek another appointment
Do
No
?
86
cu lt u r a l i n t ellige nce
BK-ThomasInkson-2nd_ed-CS3-ToPress2.indd 86
7/17/2009 9:52:40 AM
This document is authorized for use only by Kamalesh Panthi until March 2013. Copying or posting is an
infringement of copyright. Permissions@hbsp.harvard.edu or 617.783.7860.
rP
os
t
without being invited. So the whole situation was mismanaged. This is an example of different codes AND
conventions.
The economist whose invitation to visit China was never
followed up failed to appreciate the meaning of his own
communication in Chinese culture. A Chinese saying
that he had to check with his office before accepting the
invitation might have been communicating two things:
first, that he was a relatively low-status person who had
to check everything with bureaucrats; second, that he
was not really interested in visiting. So in this case the
Chinese may have made these same assumptions about
the American and concluded he was not really interested
in visiting. Chinese people seldom say “no” even when
that is what they mean. Instead, they have numerous polite ways—including the one in this story—of courteously
indicating it. This is another example of different codes
AND conventions.
op
yo
?
tC
How Cross-Cultural Communication Works
Do
No
In communication, the communicator transmits messages to
others (“receivers”) who interpret them. The process is shown
in figure 5.1.
When the receiver in turn becomes the communicator, the
process is reversed. The channel may be spoken words, written words, or nonverbal behavior such as gestures or facial
expressions. Face-to-face conversations, meetings, telephone
calls, documents, or e-mails may all be used. Successful communication occurs when the message is accurately perceived
and understood. Skills of communicating and listening, selection of an appropriate channel, and the absence of “interference” from external factors are all important. Cultural
differences threaten communication because they reduce the
available codes and conventions that are shared by sender
and receiver.
Communicating, Negotiating, and Resolving Conflicts
BK-ThomasInkson-2nd_ed-CS3-ToPress2.indd 87
87
7/17/2009 9:52:40 AM
This document is authorized for use only by Kamalesh Panthi until March 2013. Copying or posting is an
infringement of copyright. Permissions@hbsp.harvard.edu or 617.783.7860.
SENDER
CULTURAL FIELD
CHANNEL
DECODING
RECEIVER
Cross-cultural communication process
op
yo
FIGURE 5.1.
ENCODING
rP
os
t
CULTURAL FIELD
Source: Based on Schramm (1980)
The cultural field shown in figure 5.1 represents culturally
based elements in the sender’s and in the receiver’s background, such as their language, education, and values.2 The
cultural field creates the codes and conventions that affect the
communication process.
Language
Do
No
tC
Language is the most obvious code for communicating. In language, combinations of sounds represent elements of meaning
and can be combined to represent complex messages. Most
languages contain speech conventions, subtleties, and figures
of speech of which only experienced speakers may be aware.
The essence of language is that sender and receiver should
share the code. But the development and mobility of humankind has left us with thousands of different languages, plus
different dialects and adaptations of many of them.3 Most
people have only one language, which they have learned and
spoken since early childhood, and even accomplished linguists
are usually fluent in only a few. Moreover, psychologists have
determined that the best time to acquire new languages is
before the age of ten, after which we become progressively
less able to adapt.4
A complicating factor is that whatever the language, its
88
cu lt u r a l i n t ellige nce
BK-ThomasInkson-2nd_ed-CS3-ToPress2.indd 88
7/17/2009 9:52:40 AM
This document is authorized for use only by Kamalesh Panthi until March 2013. Copying or posting is an
infringement of copyright. Permissions@hbsp.harvard.edu or 617.783.7860.
rP
os
t
everyday use normally goes beyond any simple single code
such as that in a dictionary. Languages are living entities that
grow and change to accommodate the widely different groups
who use them and the changes in the social circumstances in
which they are used. For example, among young speakers of
English, language is becoming more direct and dramatic, so
that
op
yo
“She accused me of breaking the window. I said I hadn’t.”
has become:
“She’s like, ‘You trashed the window!’ I’m like, ‘No way it was
me!’”
Do
No
tC
In most cultures, different groups have their own vocabularies, slang, accents, and idioms. Sometimes the differences
are so strong and systematic that we say they have a different
dialect. Technical or social groups may develop their own
jargon and may use the jargon to distance themselves from
outsiders. Another common linguistic convention is euphemism, when words with sexual or other potentially impolite connotations are replaced with less explicit words. For
example, in some English-speaking cultures it is common to
say that someone has “passed away” rather than “died.”
Finally, most of us would be surprised at the extent to
which we mindlessly use proverbs, maxims, and even slogans
or catchphrases heard on television as part of our day-to-day
conversation. Examples are the Anglo-American expressions
“it’s a no-brainer,” “yadda yadda yadda,” and “it’s not rocket
science.” Such expressions are in good English but may genuinely puzzle outsiders.
Finding Common Language Codes
While language is a wonderful tool for communication, it is
also fraught with difficulties. Two people seeking to communicate with each other who do not have any overlapping
Communicating, Negotiating, and Resolving Conflicts
BK-ThomasInkson-2nd_ed-CS3-ToPress2.indd 89
89
7/17/2009 9:52:41 AM
This document is authorized for use only by Kamalesh Panthi until March 2013. Copying or posting is an
infringement of copyright. Permissions@hbsp.harvard.edu or 617.783.7860.
rP
os
t
tC
op
yo
language codes face a major barrier. They can, of course,
employ translators. But translation is time-consuming and
expensive. It also complicates the communication process
and potentially distorts the message by requiring a further
transformation.
People who choose to learn and use a foreign language
find benefits beyond simply overcoming the language barrier. Most people appreciate the efforts that others may have
made to learn their language. So even though your fluency
in another language may be limited, the fact that you have
made the effort may generate goodwill.5 In addition, language
conveys many subtleties about a culture that a person with
high cultural intelligence might notice and use.
However, learning a new language carries major costs.
Becoming fluent in another language takes substantial study
and practice, particularly if that language is unlike your own
in pronunciation, grammar, and conventions. Language learners expend considerable time and effort in learning, and find
that when using the language they feel stressed and may even
be distracted from other aspects of the situation. Also, lack
of fluency may unfairly undermine credibility in the eyes of
fluent speakers. In contrast, fluency may lead to the speaker
being perceived, sometimes mistakenly, as being competent in
other areas, such as overall cultural intelligence. 6
Second-Language Use
Do
No
One by-product of the Anglo-American economic dominance
of the twentieth century and the relentless unwillingness of
British and American people to learn languages other than
their own has been to make English increasingly the accepted
common language of business. Worldwide, the learning of
English to facilitate international communication has become
a major activity. This change facilitates international business
communication. Those who speak English as their only language owe a debt to the millions of people around the world
90
cu lt u r a l i n t ellige nce
BK-ThomasInkson-2nd_ed-CS3-ToPress2.indd 90
7/17/2009 9:52:41 AM
This document is authorized for use only by Kamalesh Panthi until March 2013. Copying or posting is an
infringement of copyright. Permissions@hbsp.harvard.edu or 617.783.7860.
rP
os
t
tC
op
yo
who have gone out of their way to learn to understand, read,
speak, and write in the English language.
Learning English as a second language (ESL) is full of
challenges. The language’s richness of vocabulary and its
numerous synonyms can cause ESL speakers great difficulty.
Take the simple word “fly.” It can mean an annoying insect, a
means of travel, or an important part of men’s trousers.7
A person fluent in English who is communicating with a
less skilled English speaker has an obligation to communicate
in relatively standard terms, to avoid jargon and obscure language, and to avoid assumptions about comprehension by the
other person. Culturally intelligent people will consciously
adapt their language to be in harmony with the vocabulary
and style of the other person.
Some ESL speakers—particularly those from cultures that
set high store by not losing face—pretend to understand when
they really do not. In these situations there is a special onus
on the parties to be aware of barriers and limitations in their
sending and receiving, and to check whether messages have
successfully gotten through.
The following are some brief guidelines that culturally
intelligent people can use to help improve communication
with ESL speakers.
Second-Language Strategies
Enunciate carefully.
?
Avoid colloquial expressions.
Do
No
?
?
?
?
Repeat important points using different words to explain
the same concept.
Use active verbs and avoid long compound sentences.
Use visual restatements such as pictures, graphs, tables,
and slides.
?
Hand out written summaries of your verbal presentation.
?
Pause more frequently, and do not jump in to fill silences.
Communicating, Negotiating, and Resolving Conflicts
BK-ThomasInkson-2nd_ed-CS3-ToPress2.indd 91
91
7/17/2009 9:52:41 AM
This document is authorized for use only by Kamalesh Panthi until March 2013. Copying or posting is an
infringement of copyright. Permissions@hbsp.harvard.edu or 617.783.7860.
?
?
Take frequent breaks, and allow more time.
Do not attribute poor grammar or mispronunciation to
lack of intelligence.
Check for understanding by encouraging speakers to
repeat concepts back to you.
Avoid embarrassing speakers, but encourage and reinforce their participation.8
op
yo
?
rP
os
t
?
Conventions
Communication conventions cover the ways that language
and other codes are used within a particular culture. Once
again, cultural values and norms, such as those based on
collectivism or individualism, are apparent.
E x plicit a nd Implicit Commu nicat ion
Do
No
tC
There is a Western view that individuals perceive something
called the truth and should state it, and a convention that
communication should be verbal and that verbal messages
should be explicit, direct, and unambiguous. But in other
cultures—for example, many Middle Eastern and Asian cultures—there is no absolute truth, and politeness and desire to
avoid embarrassment often take precedence. The convention
is therefore that communication is implicit and indirect. In
the direct convention of communication, most of the message
is placed in the content of the communication—the words
that are used. In the indirect convention, the context is more
important—for example, the physical setting, the previous
relationships between the participants, and the nonverbal
behavior of those involved.
The direct convention tends to be the norm in countries
with individualist cultures, the indirect in countries with
collectivist cultures. Understanding apparently indirect communication in collectivist cultures may sometimes be simply
a matter of learning another code. The examples in the fol92
cu lt u r a l i n t ellige nce
BK-ThomasInkson-2nd_ed-CS3-ToPress2.indd 92
7/17/2009 9:52:41 AM
This document is authorized for use only by Kamalesh Panthi until March 2013. Copying or posting is an
infringement of copyright. Permissions@hbsp.harvard.edu or 617.783.7860.
rP
os
t
lowing box show a variety of ways of saying no politely and
indirectly. In most cases a low-CQ individual would understandably think that the answer might be “yes.”
S AY I N G “ N O ” I N R ES P O N S E TO
“ H A S MY P RO P O S A L B E EN ACC E P T E D ? ” 9
If everything proceeds as planned, the
proposal will be approved.
Have you submitted a copy of your
proposal to…
Purchase answer to see full
attachment