MTSU Role of Nurse Informaticist in Systems Development and Implementation Paper Assume you are a nurse manager on a unit where a new nursing documentation

MTSU Role of Nurse Informaticist in Systems Development and Implementation Paper Assume you are a nurse manager on a unit where a new nursing documentation system is to be implemented. You want to ensure that the system will be usable and acceptable for the nurses impacted. You realize a nurse leader must be on the implementation team.

To Prepare:

Review the steps of the Systems Development Life Cycle (SDLC) and reflect on the scenario presented.
Consider the benefits and challenges associated with involving a nurse leader on an implementation team for health information technology.

The Assignment: (2-3 pages)

In preparation of filling this role, develop a 2- to 3-page role description for a graduate-level nurse to guide his/her participation on the implementation team. The role description should be based on the SDLC stages and tasks and should clearly define how this individual will participate in and impact each of the following steps:

Planning and requirements definition
Analysis
Design of the new system
Implementation
Post-implementation support Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_6050_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
EXIT
List View
Program/Policy
Evaluation
Based on the
program or
policy evaluation
you seelcted,
complete the
Healthcare
Program/Policy
Evaluation
Analysis
Template. Be
sure to address
the following:
· Describe the
healthcare
program or
policy outcomes.
· How was the
success of the
program or
policy
measured?
· How many
people were
reached by the
program or
policy selected?
How much of an
impact was
realized with the
program or
policy selected?
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
32 (32%) – 35
28 (28%) – 31
25 (25%) – 27
0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
Response
accurately
describes the
healthcare
program or
policy
outcomes.
Description of
the healthcare
program or
policy
outcomes is
inaccurate or
incomplete.
Description of
the healthcare
program or
policy
outcomes is
inaccurate and
incomplete, or
is missing.
Response
accurately
explains how
the success of
the program
or policy was
measured.
Explanation of
how the
success of the
program or
policy was
measured is
inaccurate or
incomplete.
(35%)
Response
clearly and
accurately
describes in
detail the
healthcare
program or
policy
outcomes.
Response
accurately and
thoroughly
explains in
detail how the
success of the
program or
policy was
measured.
Response
clearly and
accurately
describes in
detail how
many people
were reached
by the
program or
policy and fully
describes the
impact of the
program or
(31%)
Response
accurately
describes
how many
people were
reached by
the program
or policy and
accurately
describes the
impact of the
program or
policy.
Response
accurately
indicates the
(27%)
Description of
how many
people were
reached by the
program or
policy and the
impact is
vague or
inaccurate.
Response
vaguely
describes the
point at which
the program or
policy
Explanation of
how the
success of the
program or
policy was
measured is
inaccurate and
incomplete, or
is missing.
Description of
how many
people were
reached by the
program or
policy and the
associated
impacts is
vague and
inaccurate, or
is missing.
Response of
the point at
which time the
· At what point
in time in
program
implementation
was the program
or policy
evaluation
conducted?
policy.
Reporting of
Program/Policy
Evaluations
45 (45%) – 50
· What data was
used to conduct
the program or
policy
evaluation?
· What speci!c
information on
unintended
consequences
was identi!ed?
· What
stakeholders
were identi!ed
in the evaluation
of the program
or policy? Who
would bene!t
the most from
the results and
reporting of the
program or
policy
evaluation? Be
speci!c and
provide
examples.
· Did the
program or
policy meet the
original intent
and objectives?
Why or why not?
· Would you
recommend
implementing
Response
clearly and
accurately
indicates the
point at which
time the
program or
policy
evaluation was
conducted.
(50%)
Response
clearly and
accurately
identi!es the
data used to
conduct the
program or
policy
evaluation.
Response
clearly and
thoroughly
explains in
detail speci!c
information on
outcomes and
unintended
consequences
identi!ed
through the
program or
policy
evaluation.
Response
clearly and
accurately
explains in
detail the
stakeholders
involved in the
program or
policy
evaluation.
Response
point at which
time the
program or
policy
evaluation
was
conducted.
evaluation was
conducted.
program or
policy was
conducted is
missing.
40 (40%) – 44
35 (35%) – 39
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Response
vaguely or
inaccurately
identi!es the
data used to
conduct the
program or
policy
evaluation.
Identi!cation
of the data
used to
conduct the
program or
policy
evaluation is
vague and
inaccurate, or
is missing.
(44%)
Response
accurately
identi!es the
data used to
conduct the
program or
policy
evaluation.
Response
explains in
detail speci!c
information
on outcomes
and
unintended
consequences
identi!ed
through the
program or
policy
evaluation.
Response
explains in
detail the
stakeholders
involved in
the program
or policy
evaluation.
Response
explains who
would bene!t
most from
the results
(39%)
Explanation of
speci!c
information on
outcomes and
unintended
consequences
identi!ed
through the
program or
policy
evaluation is
vague or
incomplete.
Explanation of
the
stakeholders
involved in the
program or
policy
evaluation is
vague or
inaccurate.
Explanation of
who would
bene!t most
Explanation of
speci!c
information on
outcomes and
unitended
consequences
identi!ed
through the
program or
policy
evaluation is
vague and
incomplete, or
is missing.
Explanation of
the
stakeholders
involved in the
program or
policy
evaluation is
vague and
inaccurate, or
is missing.
Explanation of
this program or
policy in your
place of work?
Why or why not?
· Identify at
least two ways
that you, as a
nurse advocate,
could become
involved in
evaluating a
program or
policy after 1
year of
implementation.
clearly and
accurately
explains in
detail who
would bene!t
most from the
results and
reporting of
the program or
policy
evaluation.
Response
includes a
thorough and
accurate
explanation of
whether the
program met
the original
intent and
outcomes,
including an
accurate and
detailed
explanation of
the reasons
supporting
why or why
not.
Response
includes a
thorough and
accurate
explanation of
whether the
program
should be
implemented,
including an
accurate and
detailed
explanation of
the reasons
supporting
why or why
not.
Written
Expression and
Formatting –
and reporting
of the
program or
policy
evaluation.
Response
includes an
accurate
explanation
of whether
the program
met the
original intent
and
outcomes,
including an
accurate
explanation
of the
reasons
supporting
why or why
not.
Response
includes an
accurate
explanation
of whether
the program
should be
implemented,
including an
accurate
explanation
of the
reasons
supporting
why or why
not.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs
and sentences
Paragraphs
and
from the
results and
reporting of
the program or
policy
evaluation is
vague or
inaccurate.
Explanation of
whether the
program/policy
met the
original intent
and outcomes
and the
reasons why or
why not is
incomplete or
inaccurate.
Explanation of
whether the
program or
policy should
be
implemented,
and the
reasons why or
why not, is
incomplete or
inaccurate.
who would
bene!t most
from the
results and
reporting of
the program
or policy
evaluation is
vague and
inaccurate, or
is missing.
Explanation of
whether the
program or
policy met the
original intent
and outcomes
and the
reasons why
or why not is
incomplete
and
inaccurate, or
is missing.
Explanation of
whether the
program or
policy should
be
implemented,
and the
reasons why
or why not, is
incomplete
and
inaccurate, or
is missing.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs
Paragraphs
and sentences
(3.5%)
Paragraph
Development
and
Organization:
Paragraphs
make clear
points that
support well
developed ideas,
“ow logically,
and demonstrate
continuity of
ideas. Sentences
are carefully
focused–neither
long and
rambling nor
short and lacking
substance. A
clear and
comprehensive
purpose
statement and
introduction is
provided which
delineates all
required criteria.
Written
Expression and
Formatting English writing
standards:
Correct
grammar,
mechanics, and
proper
punctuation
Written
Expression and
Formatting – The
paper follows
correct APA
format for title
page, headings,
font,
spacing, margins,
indentations,
page numbers,
follow writing
standards for
“ow,
continuity, and
clarity.
sentences
follow writing
standards for
“ow,
continuity,
and clarity
80% of the
time.
and sentences
follow writing
standards for
“ow,
continuity, and
clarity 60%79% of the
time.
Purpose,
introduction,
and
conclusion of
the
assignment is
stated, yet is
brief and not
descriptive.
Purpose,
introduction,
and conclusion
of the
assignment is
vague or o#
topic.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5
Uses correct
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
with no errors.
Contains a
few (1-2)
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.
(3.5%)
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains
several (3-4)
grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors.
Contains many
(? 5) grammar,
spelling, and
punctuation
errors that
interfere with
the reader’s
understanding.
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5
0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Uses correct
APA format
with no errors.
Contains a
few (1-2) APA
format errors.
A clear and
comprehensive
purpose
statement,
introduction,
and conclusion
is provided
which
delineates all
required
criteria.
(3.5%)
Contains
several (3-4)
APA format
errors.
follow writing
standards for
“ow,
continuity, and
clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. Contains many (? 5) APA format errors. parenthetical/intext citations, and reference list. Total Points: 100 Name: NURS_6050_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric EXIT Purchase answer to see full attachment