HC 450 Herzing University Create the Ehr Vision5-B Identify the Planning Horizon Other Unit 3 Assignment 2 – Planning for EHR Submit Assignment Due Sunda
HC 450 Herzing University Create the Ehr Vision5-B Identify the Planning Horizon Other Unit 3 Assignment 2 – Planning for EHR
Submit Assignment
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 40
Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload
Instructions
Review the information provided for an example EHR implementation, including each activity’s duration and predecessor(s):
Activity Duration (days) Predecessor
A Create the EHR vision 5 –
B Identify the planning horizon 10 A
C Obtain buy-in from affected parties 30 B
D Develop a financing and acquisition strategy 10 C
E Develop functional, data, and technical strategies 45 C
F Conduct vendor selection 45 D, E
G Plan the EHR implementation 15 C, E, F
H Conduct benefits realization study 10 A-H
Draw the PERT or GANTT chart for this implementation based on the information provided.
Indicate the critical path on the PERT or GANTT chart.
Your file should be in Microsoft Word, Microsoft PowerPoint, Microsoft Excel, or Adobe Acrobat format.
Cite all sources in APA format.
Submit your PERT or GANTT chart for grading.
Reminder: You must upload your completed document using Browse My Computer. Then, hit the Submit button to successfully complete the assignment submission process. Do not copy and paste text into the text box.
Rubric
Unit 3 Assignment 2 – Planning for EHR
Unit 3 Assignment 2 – Planning for EHR
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
20.0 pts
Level 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
18.0 pts
Level 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
16.0 pts
Level 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
14.0 pts
Level 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
12.0 pts
Level 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.
0.0 pts
Level 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P
10.0 pts
Level 5
Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
9.0 pts
Level 4
Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
8.0 pts
Level 3
Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
7.0 pts
Level 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.
6.0 pts
Level 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0.0 pts
Level 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
5.0 pts
Level 5
The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
4.5 pts
Level 4
The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
4.0 pts
Level 3
The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
3.5 pts
Level 2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
3.0 pts
Level 1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0.0 pts
Level 0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty in discerning the meaning.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
5.0 pts
Level 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
4.5 pts
Level 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
4.0 pts
Level 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
3.5 pts
Level 2
The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
3.0 pts
Level 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate a limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0.0 pts
Level 0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.
5.0 pts
Total Points: 40.0
PreviousNext
