COM 456 Grand Canyon University Concept Analysis Course Analysis Concept Analysis Select three course concepts. In 500-750 words: Develop an analysis of
COM 456 Grand Canyon University Concept Analysis Course Analysis Concept Analysis
Select three course concepts. In 500-750 words:
Develop an analysis of how each concept speaks to the overall quality of this persons work life.
Explain why you selected these concepts.
One to two sources are required for this assignment.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. Please put quotation marks properly when using in text citations
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Three course concepts below
People in Organizations
Objectives:
Describe individuals, groups and leadership
Explain the role of leadership within organizations
Problem Solving in Organizations
Objectives:
Describe the different methods of problem solving and decision?making
Explain the difference between decision?making and problem solving
Organizations and Conflict
Objectives:
Identify the different phases of organizational conflict
Distinguish the difference in how groups and individual handle conflict
Please site the textbook Fundamentals of Organizational Communication Book by Pamela Shockley-Zalabak Course Code
COM-456
Class Code
COM-456-O501
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Develop an analysis of how each concept speaks
to the overall quality of the work life
35.0%
Explain why you selected these concepts
35.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Research Citations (in-text citations for
paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference
page listing and formatting, as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Concept Analysis
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Analysis of how each concept speaks to the overall quality of
the work life is incomplete or missing.
Explanation of selected concepts is incomplete or missing.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses non-credible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice
and/or sentence construction are used.
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
No reference page is included. No citations are used.
Total Points
75.0
Less than Satisfactory (65.00%)
Analysis of how each concept speaks to the overall quality of
the work life is weak and missing evidence.
Explanation of selected concepts is weak and missing
evidence.
Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or
vague; purpose is not clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or
word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but
not varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
Satisfactory (75.00%)
Analysis of how each concept speaks to the overall quality of
the work life is appropriate.
Explanation of selected concepts is appropriate.
Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to
purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not
overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Reference page is included and lists sources used in the
paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although
some errors may be present.
Good (85.00%)
Analysis of how each concept speaks to the overall quality of
the work life is strong with sound analysis and appropriate
evidence.
Explanation of selected concepts is strong with sound analysis
and appropriate evidence.
Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the
development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of
the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited
sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is
usually correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Analysis of how each concept speaks to the overall quality of
the work life is comprehensive and insightful with well
researched evidence.
Explanation of selected concepts is comprehensive and
insightful with well researched evidence.
Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of
the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement
makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in
a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Comments
In-text citations and a reference page are complete and
correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
