Your Kids at Risk how Teen Sex Threatens Our Sons and Daughters Book Review Book review on the reference: Meeker, M. J. (2007). Your kids at risk: how teen

Your Kids at Risk how Teen Sex Threatens Our Sons and Daughters Book Review Book review on the reference: Meeker, M. J. (2007). Your kids at risk: how teen sex threatens our sons and daughters. Washington, DC: Regnery Pub. DBFA 615
4 MAT REVIEWS INSTRUCTIONS
The 4 MAT REVIEW system is a way of responding to readings that requires the learner to
interact with new ideas on several levels.
Please use the following format in preparing 4 MAT REVIEWS:
Summary:
Summarize what you have read as if you were the author boiling down the book into 300 words
(just like reading the jacket of a book to decide if you want to read the book itself). Prove that
you comprehend the readings by writing a clear, concise summary.
Concrete responses:
Get vulnerable! In 300 words, relate a personal life episode that this book connected with in your
own life experience. Relate your story in first person, describing action, quoting sentences you
remember hearing or saying. In the teaching style of Jesus, this is a do-it-yourself parable, case
study, confession. You will remember almost nothing you have read unless you make this
critical, personal connection. What video memory began to roll? This is your chance to tell your
story and make new ideas found in the book your own.
Reflection:
What new questions pop up for you in response to what you have read? Keep a rough note sheet
at hand as you read. Begin with questions like, “What would I like further information on?”
Where do I not agree/strongly agree with the author?” or “What bothers me/excites me about this
content?” This section should be at least 300 words.
Application:
How does information book influence how you are going to continue your own personal growth
process? What actions or changes are you going to make in your life as a result of your learning?
Your response here is a matter of obedience first, questions later. Be precise in summarizing
your action steps (limit these comments to about 400 words).
Submit your 4 MAT Review 1 by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 4.
Submit your 4 MAT Review 2 by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 6.
4-MAT MEEKER PAPER GRADING RUBRIC TEMPLATE (BASED ON 100 POINT TOTAL)
Criteria
Advanced 92-100 (A- to A):
Satisfies criteria w/ excellence
Proficient 84-91 (B- to B+) :
Satisfies Criteria
Developing (C- to C+):
Satisfies most criteria
Below Expectations (F to
D+):
Does not satisfy criteria
Not
Present
Content: 70% = 70 pts
Summary
Concrete
Response
Reflection
With
Insight
Application
16-20 pts.
11-15 pts.
6-10 pts.
1–5 pts.
Summary is highlights key
elements and is strongly
presented, along with Biblical
worldview of author. It provides a
clear overview of the book’s
contents.
11-15 pts.
Summary identifies some of the
key elements, while omitting other
important ones. It provides an
overview of the book’s contents
and aspects of the author’s
worldview.
8-10 pts.
Summary introduces the
book, but does not adequately
provide the author’s
worldview, and needs overall
improvement.
Summary does not provide
an overview of the book’s
contents and the author’s
worldview, nor the key
elements.
5-7 pts.
1-4 pts.
Provides specific examples from
life experience with sufficient
detail, relating it to the content of
text clearly.
Provides examples from life
experience with sufficient detail,
but lacks sufficient correlation
with the content of the text.
Provides expamples from life
with sufficient detail, but does
not demonstrate an
understanding of its
connection with content of
text.
Provides examples from
life, but undeveloped and
lacks integration of content
of the text.
16-20 pts.
11-15 pts.
6-10 pts.
1–5 pts.
Demonstrates an understanding of
the content and expresses
insightful questions, well
presented disagreements, and
thoughtful summary statements,
motivating the reader to pursue
further.
Shows a relative understanding of
content, but in need of more
evident thought and substantial
critique of the material.
Although evidence of
subjective thought, objective
analysis is lacking. Need to
move beyond the material
presented in book to how the
concepts inform study and
work.
Effort made to work with
the material and think
beyond the text, but weak
and undeveloped, as well as
unsubstantiated.
11-15 pts.
8-10 pts.
5-7 pts.
1–4 pts.
Identifies specific and personal
ways to apply the text’s concepts
to student’s own life. Thorough
and on topic.
Provides specific and personal
application of concepts in the text,
but could use more development
to be sufficiently thorough.
Provides personal application
of concepts in text, but
without specificity or
sufficient development.
Offered only minimal
application, but without
correlation to the text’s
concepts.
11-15 pts.
8-10 pts.
5-7 pts.
1-4 pts.
All required elements are included
and presented with strong
headings and organizational
clarity. There are clear transitions
between paragraphs and sections.
All required elements are
included, but organization of
writing needs work. The paper
meets the page length
requirement.
Most required elements are
included, but not well
organized. Most paragraphs
and sections have transitions.
The paper may not meet the
page length requirement.
Few or no required elements
are included. Few or no
transitions exist between
paragraphs and sections.
There may not be a logical
treatment of the material.
0 points
0 points
0 points
0 points
Structure: 30% = 30 pts
Organization
0 points
Points
Earned
The paper meets the page length
requirement.
11-15 pts.
Style
and
Format
The paper properly uses current
APA style and DCCC
Professional Writing Guidelines.
Proper headings, in-text citations,
and references are formatted
correctly. The paper reflects a
graduate level voice and
vocabulary. There are very few
spelling and grammar errors.
8-10 pts.
5-7 pts.
The paper consistently uses
current APA style and DCCC
Professional Writing Guidelines
with few or no exceptions. Proper
headings, in-text citations, and
references are formatted with few
or no errors. The paper reflects a
graduate level voice and
vocabulary. There are few spelling
and grammar errors.
The paper inconsistently uses
APA style and DCCC
Professional Writing
Guidelines. Headings, in-text
citations, and references are
inconsistently formatted. The
paper does not consistently
reflect a graduate level voice
and vocabulary. There are
spelling and grammar errors.
The paper does not meet the
page length requirement.
1-4 pts.
The paper erroneously uses
or does not use APA style
and DCCC Professional
Writing Guidelines.
Headings, in-text citations,
and references are
erroneously formatted or not
present. The paper does not
reflect a graduate level
voice and vocabulary. There
are spelling and grammar
errors.
Total
Instructor’s comments:
0 points

Purchase answer to see full
attachment