San Diego State University The Case for Torture Draft Please post your rough draft of Project #1 here. Your rough draft should be attached to your post as

San Diego State University The Case for Torture Draft Please post your rough draft of Project #1 here. Your rough draft should be attached to your post as either a Microsoft Word document or as a PDF. This draft should be complete to ensure that you will as much valuable feedback as possible from your classmates. Incomplete drafts will only be eligible for partial credit.

https://writingcommons.org/chapters/the-writing-pr…

it’s just the rough draft this week RWS 305w
Amber Anaya
Project #1: Comparative Analysis and Argument
Note: Some of these instructions are modified from our course text, Successful College Composition.
Introduction:
This assignment builds on what you learned in RWS 200 and other introductory
composition courses. It has two parts to it: 1) An analysis and evaluation of two
texts, and 2) A brief argument supporting your own position on the topic.
Remember that these two parts of the assignment should form a cohesive essay.
Instructions:
Part 1:
Begin your assignment by creating an introduction and thesis statement that
overviews your project and position on this topic.
Next, analyze and evaluate “The Case for Torture” by Levin and “The Case Against
Torture” by Solomon, both linked to on page 133 of our text.
Think about the rhetorical situation, the purpose of the articles, and the various
rhetorical strategies used in these two arguments. Next, explain elements of
context embedded in the arguments—the clues that suggest what the arguments
are responding to, both in the sense of what has been written before it and in the
sense that it is written for an audience in a particular time and place—and to
evaluate how effectively the arguments persuade the audience within this specific
context.
Finally, decide which one you think is the most convincing to its target audience,
based on your analysis of the authors’ use of ethos, pathos, and logos, along with
other rhetorical devices and strategies. Writing a comparative analysis means
more than simply summarizing the different arguments. Instead, you will be
making an argument about the two texts, using as support specific examples
from the articles you select. For instance, you may claim that one argument is
more effective than another because of the reliability and quantity of its support
(i.e., logos). You may also make claims about the credentials or biases of the
authors and their testimony or their writing strategies, including their definitions
of key terms, overall organization, and tone.
In your rhetorical comparative analysis essay, you are expected to:
q
q
q
q
q
q
Explain your project (not the authors’ of your texts projects) for the paper
using metadiscourse.
Discuss the rhetorical situation of each article, paying particular attention
to the authors’ intended audience and emphasizing the context in which
the arguments are responding.
Identify the major claims, explaining how they relate to the overall
arguments.
Compare each argument by evaluating each author’s use of ethos, pathos,
logos, and other rhetorical strategies. You may also look at the authors’ use
of evidence, tone, organization, and other writing strategies.
Explore the significance of your analysis (why does this matter?).
Use an effective structure that carefully guides your reader from one idea
to the next, thoroughly editing your writing so it is comprehensible and
appropriate for an academic audience.
Part 2:
Next, use this analysis and evaluation to support and develop your own position
on the topic.
1. Using your evaluation and analysis of the two texts from Part 1, develop
your own position for or against this issue.
2. Make your appeals in support of your position by using sound, credible
evidence. This evidence should be drawn from the articles evaluated above,
but you may also use outside sources to strengthen your argument. If you
choose to do this, use a balance of facts and opinions from a wide range of
sources, such as scientific studies, expert testimony, statistics, and personal
anecdotes. Each piece of evidence should be fully explained and clearly
stated. See Chapters 1.3 and 4.7 for information on how to correctly
incorporate outside sources into your writing.
3. Make sure that your style and tone are appropriate for your subject and
audience. Tailor your language and word choice to these two factors, while
still being true to your own voice.
4. Finally, write a conclusion that effectively summarizes your main argument
and reinforces your thesis. Include a brief summary of your analysis from
Part 1 and explain how this informed the position you took in Part 2.
Other Requirements:
• Your essay must be 4-5 pages long (not including title pages or references
pages)
• Please use Times New Roman, 12 point font, double spaced
• You may use MLA or APA format—choose the format you are most familiar
with.
Grading Criteria:
• Does the essay incorporate all components from Parts 1 and 2 of the
instructions?
• Is the essay clear, coherent, and well organized?
• Is the analysis of the two arguments well developed, objective, and
rhetorically based? Does it address all elements listed in the assignment
instructions?
• Is the argument clear,well-supported, and persuasive? Does it avoid bias
and logical fallacies?
• Does the essay clearly show the relationship between the analysis and the
development of the argument?
• Is the essay revised, edited, and proofread? Is the writing clear?
• Does the essay follow either APA or MLA documentation and formatting
guidelines? Have the two essays used for analysis been listed on the
references or works cited page? Have in-text citations been used correctly
and appropriately?

Purchase answer to see full
attachment