Perspectives of Allied Health Practitioners Study Presentation Component 1 Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study Read Stevens,

Perspectives of Allied Health Practitioners Study Presentation Component 1
Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study

Read Stevens, K., (2013) The impact of evidence-based practice in nursing and the next big ideas. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 18,(2), Manuscript 4. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol18No02Man04

Critically evaluate either Study 3 or Study 4. Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this study contributes to evidence-based practice.

Study 3 – Exploring the perspectives of allied health practitioners toward the use of journal clubs as a medium for promoting evidence-based practice: a qualitative study
Study 4 – Staff Practice, Attitudes, and Knowledge/Skills Regarding Evidence-Based Practice Before and After an Educational Intervention

All submissions must have a minimum of two scholarly references to support your work.

Examples of work to show mastery:

5-6 page paper – APA format
12-15 slide PowerPoint presentation – Evidenced-Based Practice – Critical Evaluation of Qualitative or Quantitative Research Study
Description: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate knowledge of research and its
utilization in practice.
Component: Essential III, IV, VII, IX
Area
Gold
Silver
Bronze
Unacceptable
Mastery
Acceptable
Developing
credibility
Evaluates
Evaluates
Evaluates
Does not
credibility of
credibility of
credibility of
address section
research article
research article
research article
or includes less
the components
using most of the using one-half of
than one-half of
of the appropriate components
the evaluation
the evaluation
evaluation
(Greater than 3/4) checklist in Houser
checklist in
of the evaluation
(2018)
Houser (2018)
checklist in
Houser (2018).
problem statement Evaluates the
Evaluates the
Evaluates the
Does not
and research
problem
problem
problem
address section
design
statement and
statement and
statement and
or includes less
research design
research design
research design
than one-half of
using the
using most of the using one-half of
the evaluation
components of
components of
the evaluation
the evaluation
the evaluation
checklists in
checklist in
(greater than ¾)
Houser (2018).
Houser (2018)
checklists in
Houser (2018)
ethical issues
Evaluates ethical
Evaluates ethical
Evaluates ethical
Does not
issues in the study issues in the study issues in the study address section
using the
using 3/4 of the
using 3/4 of the
or includes less
components of
components of
components of the than one-half of
the evaluation
the evaluation
evaluation
the evaluation
checklist in
checklist in
checklist in Houser
Houser (2018).
Houser (2018).
(2018).
Evaluates the
Evaluates the
Evaluates the
Evaluates the
Does not
purpose statement purpose
purpose
purpose statement address section
statement using
statement using ¾ using one-half of
or includes less
the components
of the
the components of than one-half of
of the evaluation
components of
the evaluation
the evaluation
checklist in
the evaluation
checklist in Houser
Houser (2018)
checklist in
(2018)
Houser (2018)
Evaluates the
Evaluates the
Evaluates the
Evaluates the
Does not
literature review
literature review
literature review
literature review
address section
using the
using ¾ of the
using one-half of
or includes less
components of
components of
the components of than one-half of
the evaluation
the evaluation
the evaluation
the evaluation
checklist in
checklist in
checklist in Houser
Houser (2018)
Houser (2018)
(2018)
Evaluates the
sampling strategy
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy
Evaluates how
study results may
(or may not) be
used to inform EBP
Evaluates the
sampling strategy
using the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy and
validity in
quantitative
studies using
most of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative studies
using most of the
checklist
components in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
sampling strategy
using 3/4 of the
components of
the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using 3/4
of the evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative studies
using 3/4 of the
components of
the checklist in
Houser (2018).
Evaluates the
sampling strategy
using one-half of
the components of
the evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018).
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using onehalf of the
evaluation
checklist in Houser
(2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness of
data in qualitative
studies using onehalf of the
components of the
checklist in Houser
(2018).
Evaluates how
study results may
(or may not) be
used to inform
EBP.
Discusses study
results in general
but not how
findings may or
may not
contribute to EBP.
Discusses EBP in
general but does
not relate to the
research study.
Does not
address section
or includes less
than one-half of
the evaluation
Evaluates the
measurement
strategy in
quantitative
studies using
one-fourth or
less of the
evaluation
checklist in
Houser (2018).
OR
Evaluates
trustworthiness
of data in
qualitative
studies using
one-fourth or
less of the
components of
the checklist in
Houser (2018).
Does not
discuss results
or how study
findings can
inform EBP.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment