MGT521 Saudi electronic university Organisational Change Papers We have learned that organizational change is a process rather than an event. It often star

MGT521 Saudi electronic university Organisational Change Papers We have learned that organizational change is a process rather than an event. It often starts with knowing what to change, continues through how to change, and then concludes with when to change. Using these steps as a foundation, present a three-to-five-page paper that addresses the following:

Research organizations in KSA that, in the past three years, have completed a major change to their organization (e.g., merged with or acquired another firm, expanded operations, significantly reduced staff, etc.).
Provide a brief summary of the organization and the reasons for the recent change.
Present the steps or process the organization followed, from the initiation of the change process to the implementation of the change. Which of the several frameworks from the textbook did they use or do you think they used to analyze organizational dynamics?
Discuss the stakeholders who were included in the process and indicate what their roles were.
Finally, discuss the key processes/strategies which were successful, the key processes/strategies which were not successful, and advice or suggestions you would offer (based on what you have learned thus far in this course) which may result in a more successful change initiative in the future. Which of the several frameworks from the textbook would you suggest they use to analyze organizational dynamics?

Your well-written paper should meet the following requirements:

Be three-to-five pages in length, which does not include the title page and reference pages, which are never a part of the content minimum requirements.
Use APA style.
Support your submission with course material concepts, principles, and theories from the textbook and at least three scholarly, peer-reviewed journal articles.
It is strongly encouraged that you submit all assignments into the Turnitin Originality Check prior to submitting it to your instructor for grading. If you are unsure how to submit an assignment into the Originality Check tool, review the Turnitin Originality Check – Student Guide for step-by-step instructions.
Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment. SEU_MGT521
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 3
Exceeds
Expectation
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points
Requirements
Includes all of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
21-25 Points
Content
Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive
knowledge of a
KSA organization
implementing a
major change;
with no errors or
major omissions.
25-30 Points
Analysis
Provides strong
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
13-15 Points
Sources
Sources meet
required criteria
and include three
or more scholarly,
peer-reviewed
journal articles
chosen to provide
effective
substance and
perspectives on
the issue under
examination.
Mechanics and Writing
5 Points
Demonstrates
Project is clearly
college-level
organized, well
proficiency in
written, and in
organization,
proper format as
grammar and
outlined in the
style.
assignment.
Strong sentence
Meets Expectation
Below Expectation
Limited Evidence
16-20 Points
Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
16-20 Points
Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of a KSA
organization
implementing a
major change; may
include some
minor errors or
omissions.
19-24 Points
Provides adequate
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
10-12 Points
Sources meet
required criteria
and include two
scholarly, peerreviewed journal
articles chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
11-15 Points
Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
11-15 Points
Demonstrates fair
knowledge of a KSA
organization
implementing a
major change;
and/or includes
some major errors
or omissions.
6-10 Points
Includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
6-10 Points
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of a KSA
organization
implementing a
major change;
and/or includes
many major errors
or omissions.
7-12 Points
Provides little or no
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
4-6 Points
Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.
No sources are
included.
4 Points
Project is fairly well
organized and
written and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Reasonably good
3 Points
Project is poorly
organized and
written and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Inconsistent to
13-18 Points
Provides poor
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
7-9 Points
Source meets
required criteria
and includes one
scholarly, peerreviewed journal
article chosen to
provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
1-2 Points
Project is not
organized or well
written and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
SEU_MGT521
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 3
and paragraph
structure, contains
no errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
Total points possible = 100
sentence and
paragraph
structure, may
include a few
minor errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development,
and/or includes
numerous or major
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style
or APA citations
and references.
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style,
and APA citations
and references.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment