PHIL1011 Harvard University Philosophy Ethics and Beauty Questions answer all questions Help me solve the four ethics questions and four beauty questions i

PHIL1011 Harvard University Philosophy Ethics and Beauty Questions answer all questions Help me solve the four ethics questions and four beauty questions in the file Phil 1011 Final Exam 2019
The following is a list of questions that MAY be in the exam. The final exam will be
chosen from this list, and will include half of these questions.
In the final exam, you will have to answer TWO questions: ONE question from the
Ethics section, and ONE from Beaty.
There will be TWO questions in the Ethics section, and you must answer ONE of
them.
There will be also TWO questions in the Beauty section, and you must answer ONE
of them.
The two questions in each section of the final exam will be two of the four questions
in that section we reproduce below.
Ethics Exam Questions
*1. What is the biggest difference between Kant’s moral theory and utilitarianism?
Which view is more plausible, and why? What is the best objection to your view, and
how would you respond to it?
2. What is the biggest difference between Kant’s theory of motivation and Hume’s?
Why is Hume’s theory of motivation often thought to have such striking philosophical
consequences? Hint: what is Hume’s notorious view about the rational status of
ultimate desires? Evaluate this view.
*3. What is the Euthyphro Problem? Should theists say that God is a good-maker or a
good-tracker? What is the biggest problem with the answer you’ve chosen? In your
view, what does the Euthyphro Problem show us about God and ethics?
4. What should Sam do with his extra money? Explain how your answer relates to the
moral theories we’ve explored in this unit. Give the best argument you can think of
for your view, and try to anticipate the strongest objection to it.
Beauty Exam Questions
1. According to Kant, the experience of the beautiful must be ‘disinterested.’ What
does this mean? And how does the judgment of beauty differ from merely
pleasurable experiences and judgments of perfection? Is Kant’s view that
judgments of beauty must be disinterested plausible? What might be some possible
objections, and can Kant’s account withstand them? (Consider, for instance, how
Devereaux might respond to Kant.)
2. Herder is often regarded as the philosopher who ‘saved Shakespeare.’ How did he
do this? Explain Herder’s argument for why Shakespeare should be judged
according to different standards from the Greek tragedians and consider whether it
works. What are the implications of his argument?
3. Arthur Danto writes, “To see something as art requires something that the eye
cannot descry – an atmosphere of artistic theory, a knowledge of the history of art:
an artworld.” What is the relation between aesthetics and art on Danto’s view?
Critically evaluate Danto’s use the example of Warhol’s “Brillo Boxes” (1964) to
defend his view.
4. Mary Devereaux argues that the moral status of the work of art should affect the
way we judge its quality. Do you agree with Devereaux’s argument? Drawing on
her example of Leni Riefenstahl’s The Triumph of the Will your answer should a)
provide an explication of how and why Devereaux departs from Plato’s
identification of the good with the moral, b) explicate Plato’s view (as elaborated
by Diotima in the Symposium) and c) determine which of the two views
(Devereaux’s or Plato’s) makes more sense and why. Be sure to provide a detailed
analysis of Devereaux’s response to both formalist and sophisticated formalist
approaches to Triumph of the Will.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment