AMP492 Grand Canyon University Evaluating Pressures for Change Being able to recognize potential pressures that require an organization to change its pract

AMP492 Grand Canyon University Evaluating Pressures for Change Being able to recognize potential pressures that require an organization to change its practices or processes is a vital for its success. Examine an organization in the field or industry in which you work, or are planning to work. In 1,000-1,250 words, evaluate the pressures the organization currently faces and discuss the potential effects these pressures could have on the organization. You will use your evaluation of this organization for your Implementing Change assignment.

Include the following:

Identify and describe the organization you are evaluating. Provide an overview of the industry within which the organization operates. I am a high school teacher. I teach Business math, IBCA, Publications, and Debate Club Sponsor.
Identify the environmental and organizational pressures currently driving organizational change in your field or industry. Explain the origin or reason for these pressures, and explain how they directly affect the viability of your organization.
Predict what type of organizational changes (first-order/second-order) these pressures may cause within the organization.
Provide support for your analysis and prediction.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.The rubric is attached.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Course Code
AMP-492
Class Code
AMP-492-O101
Criteria
Content
Percentage
70.0%
Describe Organization and Industry
10.0%
Identification of Environmental and
Organizational Pressures Driving Change
25.0%
Predict Type of Organizational Changes Caused
by Pressures
25.0%
Support for Analysis and Predictions
10.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
8.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Benchmark : Evaluating Pressures for Change
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
A specific organization is not identified. The industry of the
organization is not described.
Environmental and organizational pressures are not
identified.
A prediction of organizational change is not presented. The
prediction is not based on the environmental or
organizational pressures presented in the paper.
No support is provided to support the analysis or predictions
presented.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
200.0
Less than Satisfactory (65.00%)
A specific organization is identified; little to no detail is
provided to give insight into the organization. A partial
description of the industry of the organization is presented.
At least one environmental or organizational pressure is
referenced. It is unclear how the pressures identified relate to
the organization or industry. There is no indication that these
pressures are driving organizational change.
A prediction for organizational change is referenced. It is
unclear how this prediction relates to the organization and
industry. The types of organizational change likely to occur
are absent.
Significant evidence is needed to establish support for both
the analysis and prediction.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (75.00%)
A specific organization is identified and generally described. A
summary of the industry of the organization is presented.
More detail is needed to provide a comprehensive look at the
organization and industry.
Environmental and organizational pressures are generally
described. The pressures identified generally relate to the
organization or industry; it is unclear how the pressures drive
organizational change.
A general prediction of organizational change is summarized.
Key aspects of the prediction are vague. More information is
needed in order to present a viable prediction.
Some evidence is needed to fully establish support for the
analysis and prediction.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (85.00%)
A specific organization is identified and described. A
description of the industry of the organization is presented.
Some detail is needed to provide a comprehensive look at the
organization or industry.
Key environmental and organizational pressures are
described. The pressures described relate to the organization
and industry. A general correlation between the pressures
and how they drive organizational change is established.
A prediction of organizational change is presented. A
correlation between the pressures and the prediction has
been established. First-order and second-order change have
been identified. Some detail is needed for clarity.
Adequate evidence is provided to establish support for the
analysis and prediction. Some minor detail is needed for
clarity.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Comments
A specific organization is identified; the organizational
description provides insight into the organizational attributes
(vision, mission, goals, etc.) and goals. A clear description of
the industry is presented that illustrates the current state of
the industry and where it is heading. The overall narrative
provides objective insight into the organization and the
Major and minor environmental and organizational pressures
are described. The pressures described clearly relate to the
organization and industry. A very strong correlation between
the pressures and how they drive organizational change is
established.
A well-developed prediction of organizational change likely to
occur is described. A strong correlation between the
pressures and the prediction has been established. First-order
and second-order change are clearly identified and described.
The prediction demonstrates insight into organizational
change.
The analysis and prediction are well developed. Strong
evidence is used to create support for the findings.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in
a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment