NRS433 Grand Canyon Research Critiques and Picot Statement Final Draft Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback fr

NRS433 Grand Canyon Research Critiques and Picot Statement Final Draft Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback from the previous course assignments and the guidelines below.

PICOT Question

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NRS433 Grand Canyon Research Critiques and Picot Statement Final Draft Prepare this assignment as a 1,500-1,750 word paper using the instructor feedback fr
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

Revise the PICOT question you wrote in the Topic 1 assignment using the feedback you received from your instructor.

The final PICOT question will provide a framework for your capstone project (the project students must complete during their final course in the RN-BSN program of study).

Research Critiques

In the Topic 2 and Topic 3 assignments, you completed a qualitative and quantitative research critique on two articles for each type of study (4 articles total). Use the feedback you received from your instructor on these assignments to finalize the critical analysis of each study by making appropriate revisions.

The completed analysis should connect to your identified practice problem of interest that is the basis for your PICOT question.

Refer to “Research Critiques and PICOT Guidelines – Final Draft.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative in the structure of a formal paper.

Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change

Discuss the link between the PICOT question, the research articles, and the nursing practice problem you identified. Include relevant details and supporting explanation and use that information to propose evidence-based practice changes.

General Requirements

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Research Critique Guidelines
To write a critical appraisal that demonstrates comprehension of the research study conducted,
address each component below for qualitative study in the Topic 2 assignment and the
quantitative study in the Topic 3 assignment.
Successful completion of this assignment requires that you provide a rationale, include examples,
or reference content from the study in your responses.
Qualitative Study
Background of Study:
•
Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not
known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health
care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.
•
How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should
the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of
treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.
•
Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or
may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.
•
List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not
explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.
•
Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?
Method of Study:
•
Were qualitative methods appropriate to answer the research questions?
•
Did the author identify a specific perspective from which the study was developed? If so,
what was it?
•
Did the author cite quantitative and qualitative studies relevant to the focus of the study?
What other types of literature did the author include?
•
Are the references current? For qualitative studies, the author may have included studies
older than the 5-year limit typically used for quantitative studies. Findings of older
qualitative studies may be relevant to a qualitative study.
•
Did the author evaluate or indicate the weaknesses of the available studies?
•
Did the literature review include adequate information to build a logical argument?
•
When a researcher uses the grounded theory method of qualitative inquiry, the researcher
may develop a framework or diagram as part of the findings of the study. Was a
framework developed from the study findings?
© 2016. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.
Results of Study
•
What were the study findings?
•
What are the implications to nursing?
•
Explain how the findings contribute to nursing knowledge/science. Would this impact
practice, education, administration, or all areas of nursing?
Ethical Considerations
•
Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?
•
Was patient privacy protected?
•
Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?
Conclusion
•
Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.
•
Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting
impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.
•
Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the
findings to nursing practice.
•
Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.
2
Quantitative Study
Background of Study:
•
Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not
known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health
care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.
•
How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should
the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of
treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.
•
Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or
may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.
•
List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not
explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.
•
Were the purpose and research questions related to the problem?
Methods of Study
•
Identify the benefits and risks of participation addressed by the authors. Were there
benefits or risks the authors do not identify?
•
Was informed consent obtained from the subjects or participants?
•
Did it seem that the subjects participated voluntarily in the study?
•
Was institutional review board approval obtained from the agency in which the study was
conducted?
•
Are the major variables (independent and dependent variables) identified and defined?
What were these variables?
•
How were data collected in this study?
•
What rationale did the author provide for using this data collection method?
•
Identify the time period for data collection of the study.
•
Describe the sequence of data collection events for a participant.
•
Describe the data management and analysis methods used in the study.
•
Did the author discuss how the rigor of the process was assured? For example, does the
author describe maintaining a paper trail of critical decisions that were made during the
analysis of the data? Was statistical software used to ensure accuracy of the analysis?
•
What measures were used to minimize the effects of researcher bias (their experiences
and perspectives)? For example, did two researchers independently analyze the data and
compare their analyses?
Results of Study
•
What is the researcher’s interpretation of findings?
3
•
Are the findings valid or an accurate reflection of reality? Do you have confidence in the
findings?
•
What limitations of the study were identified by researchers?
•
Was there a coherent logic to the presentation of findings?
•
What implications do the findings have for nursing practice? For example, can the
findings of the study be applied to general nursing practice, to a specific population, or to
a specific area of nursing?
•
What suggestions are made for further studies?
Ethical Considerations
•
Was the study approved by an Institutional Review Board?
•
Was patient privacy protected?
•
Were there ethical considerations regarding the treatment or lack of?
Conclusion
•
Emphasize the importance and congruity of the thesis statement.
•
Provide a logical wrap-up to bring the appraisal to completion and to leave a lasting
impression and take-away points useful in nursing practice.
•
Incorporate a critical appraisal and a brief analysis of the utility and applicability of the
findings to nursing practice.
•
Integrate a summary of the knowledge learned.
Reference
Burns, N., & Grove, S. (2011). Understanding nursing research (5th ed.). St. Louis, MO:
Elsevier.
4
Course Code
NRS-433V
Class Code
NRS-433V-OL191
Criteria
Content
Percentage
60.0%
Nursing Practice Problem and PICOT Statement
5.0%
Background of Study
5.0%
Method of Study
5.0%
Results of Study
5.0%
Ethical Considerations
5.0%
Conclusion
5.0%
Evidence of Revision
10.0%
PICOT Statement, Research Article, and Nursing
Practice Problem Link (C. 2.2)
10.0%
Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Change (C.
3.2)
10.0%
Organization and Effectiveness
30.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
10.0%
Argument Logic and Construction
10.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
10.0%
Format
10.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Research Critiques and PICOT Statement Final Draft
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
A nursing practice problem is not clearly described and/or a
PICOT statement is not included.
Background of study including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is
incomplete.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of
conceptual/theoretical framework is incomplete.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications
for nursing practice is incomplete.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the
conduct of nursing research is incomplete.
Conclusion does not summarize a critical appraisal and
applicability of findings.
Final paper does not demonstrate incorporation of feedback
or evidence of revision on research critiques.
Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research
articles, and nursing practice problem is not included.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is not
included.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The
conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is
incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
300.0
Less than Satisfactory (75.00%)
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem but
lacks reliable sources.
Background of study including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is
included but lacks relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of
conceptual/theoretical framework is included but lacks
relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications
for nursing practice is included but lacks relevant details and
explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the
conduct of nursing research is included but lacks relevant
details and explanation.
Conclusion is vague and does not discuss importance to
nursing.
Incorporation of research critique feedback or evidence of
revision is incomplete.
Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research
articles, and nursing practice problem is incomplete or
incorrect.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is incomplete
or incorrect.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks
consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some
sources have questionable credibility.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence
structure, or word choice are present.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or
mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (83.00%)
PICOT statement describes a nursing practice problem and
includes a few reliable sources.
Background of study including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is
partially complete and includes some relevant details and
explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of
conceptual/theoretical framework is partially complete and
includes some relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications
for nursing practice is partially complete and includes some
relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the
conduct of nursing research is partially complete and includes
some relevant details and explanation.
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research and importance
to nursing practice.
Incorporation of research critique feedback and evidence of
revision are present.
Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research
articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks
relevant details and supporting explanation.
Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research
articles, and nursing practice problem is included but lacks
relevant details and supporting explanation. The proposed
evidence-based practice change is included but lacks
supporting explanation and relevant details.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The
argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument
logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources
used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence
structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some
minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (94.00%)
PICOT statement articulates a nursing practice problem using
supporting information from reliable sources.
Background of study including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is
complete and includes relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of
conceptual/theoretical framework is complete and includes
relevant details and explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications
for nursing practice is complete and includes relevant details
and explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the
conduct of nursing research is complete and includes relevant
details and explanation.
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical
appraisal and the findings importance to nursing practice.
Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and
revision is clearly provided.
Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research
articles, and nursing practice problem is complete and
includes relevant details and supporting explanation.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is complete
and includes supporting explanation and relevant details.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of
argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of
claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are
authoritative.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective
figures of speech are used.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in
formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
PICOT statement clearly articulates a nursing practice
problem using substantial supporting information from
numerous reliable sources.
Background of study including problem, significance to
nursing, purpose, objective, and research questions is
thorough with substantial relevant details and extensive
explanation.
Discussion of method of study including discussion of
conceptual/theoretical framework is thorough with
substantial relevant details and extensive explanation.
Discussion of study results including findings and implications
for nursing practice is thorough with substantial relevant
details and extensive explanation.
Discussion of ethical considerations associated with the
conduct of nursing research is thorough with substantial
relevant details and extensive explanation.
Conclusion summarizes utility of the research from the critical
appraisal, knowledge learned, and the importance of the
findings to nursing practice.
Comments
Evidence of incorporation of research critique feedback and
revision is comprehensive and thoroughly developed.
Discussion of the link between the PICOT statement, research
articles, and nursing practice problem is extremely thorough
with substantial relevant details and extensive supporting
explanation.
The proposed evidence-based practice change is extremely
thorough and includes substantial supporting explanation and
numerous relevant details.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
Argument is clear and convincing and presents a persuasive
claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are
authoritative.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Homework On Time
Calculate the Price of your PAPER Now
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Choose Us

Top quality papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional academic writers

We have hired a team of professional writers experienced in academic and business writing. Most of them are native speakers and PhD holders able to take care of any assignment you need help with.

Free revisions

If you feel that we missed something, send the order for a free revision. You will have 10 days to send the order for revision after you receive the final paper. You can either do it on your own after signing in to your personal account or by contacting our support.

On-time delivery

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & confidential

We use several checkers to make sure that all papers you receive are plagiarism-free. Our editors carefully go through all in-text citations. We also promise full confidentiality in all our services.

24/7 Customer Support

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

You are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper. Our academic experts will gladly help you with essays, case studies, research papers and other assignments.

Admissions

Admission help & business writing

You can be positive that we will be here 24/7 to help you get accepted to the Master’s program at the TOP-universities or help you get a well-paid position.

Reviews

Editing your paper

Our academic writers and editors will help you submit a well-structured and organized paper just on time. We will ensure that your final paper is of the highest quality and absolutely free of mistakes.

Reviews

Revising your paper

Our academic writers and editors will help you with unlimited number of revisions in case you need any customization of your academic papers