Moral realists and real moralists discussion Hi,I attached answers on file… it just 4 questions… Part 2: Short Answer Questions (3 pts ea) 29. How do s

Moral realists and real moralists discussion Hi,I attached answers on file… it just 4 questions… Part 2: Short Answer Questions (3 pts ea)
29. How do subjectivists interpret moral statements like “Beating up small children is wrong”?
30. What is the point of contention between moral realists and moral anti-realists?
Part 3: Short Essay Questions (Choose two–Your response should
be a few paragraphs long) (10 pts ea)
1. Describe Plato’s conception of the class system in the just society, and explain how each
class is supposed to play an analogical role to a part of the mind, and what implications this
has for how we think about justice in the individual.
2. What is the thesis of moral naturalism, and what is disputed between moral non-
naturalists and moral naturalists? How do these theories relate to the thesis of moral
realism?
3. Why does Aristotle think that lives primarily concerned with seeking pleasure or honor
will inevitably be incomplete? (Alternative framing: why does he think that these are
incomplete goods?) What makes Eudaimonia (good character) a complete end, according to
Aristotle?
4. What does Eudaimonia consist in on Aristotle’s view, and how does one achieve this?
Explain the concepts of teleology, complete goods, and virtue. Give a characterization of
how a virtuous person would act within some situation.
5. What criticisms might be leveled against virtue ethics (by deontologists or
consequentialists, for instance)? How might a virtue ethicist respond?
6. What is the problem of moral luck? How might one respond to problem and justify the
assignment of praise and blame?
[Optional] Comments/Feedback on the course:

Purchase answer to see full
attachment