Answer the questions after reading the two files given.
Can you help me understand this English question?
Answer the questions after reading the two files given.
1.What artifact does the author analyze for the paper? (1 pt.)
2.How do Sillars & Gronbeck explain the “critical claim”? What is the critical claim for this paper? Explain in 1-2 sentences why you say this. (3 pts.)
3.What is a preview (for a paper)? Does the author provide a preview of the content of the paper? If so, provide the preview. If not, what could the author have said as a preview? (3 pts.)
4.Sillars & Gronbeck make a specific recommendation in the second bullet of their discussion of the paper’s introduction. What is it? Explain it in your own words. (1 pt.)
5.Does this author fulfill that recommendation? How? If not, what could the author have written about? Explain in 2-3 sentences. (2 pts.)
6.What does the author conclude about the artifact? Explain it in your own words. Do you agree with the author’s conclusion/s, based on what the author said? Why or why not? Explain in 3-4 sentences. (2 pts.)
7.Identify one of the author’s end-of-paper references. Paste it below, and then paste the matching in-text citation below. Explain the similarities and differences between the two styles of citation. (3 pts.)
8.Choose one of the references, paste it below, and label each component (part) of the reference, according to the APA guidelines in this lesson. (4 pts.)
