Answer 2 duscussion board questions and submit a rough draft of final paper a 12 page

I’m trying to learn for my Law class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Capstone 6

1. Discussion Prompt #1 – Holding Juveniles Accountable 75 words

Our juvenile justice system has been augmented numerous times, specifically the past few years. Many of the changes evolved around the fact that most juvenile offenders should be held accountable and responsible for their actions, whereas previous laws focused on rehabilitation. There are many states which have legislation holding juvenile offenders accountable for their criminal behavior by providing punishment equivalent with their age, the crime committed, and any previous criminal history of the juvenile offender. In what manner do you believe juveniles should be held accountable for their criminal behavior? Explain your answer. What barriers, if any, challenge this form of legislation? Identify and explain those potential barriers.

2. Discussion Prompt #2 – Police Officer Moral Dilemmas filed 75 words

Arguably, officers have a great deal of discretion over the decisions that they make every single day. Most ethical dilemmas that police officers face derive from their powers of discretion. Describe moral dilemmas that police officers face. Identify some that are frequent and some that are unavoidable? Explain your answers.

3. Peer Review Assignment

You are to share your rough draft of your final research paper with a peer.This structured review can be utilized through the W6 Assignment discussion board.The goal is to collaborate while providing constructive feedback to better enhance your peer’s Final Paper.The following are standards to abide by while critiquing your peer’s paper:

Review the references provided for quality, currency, relevance, and authority

Review for proper APA format

Review paper for proper structure and organization

Review paper for proper spelling, grammar, and composition

All feedback for the peer review process should contain specific suggestions for improving the paper; not to leave your feedback open to interpretation.Point out the specific problems you have identified, as well as suggestions, for improvement.Your feedback should remain objective, constructive, and professional.