University of California Ancient Greek Aristotle Philosophy Paper Inquiry Assignments: 5 Pages Paper (structure will follow the format set out in Boylan, C

University of California Ancient Greek Aristotle Philosophy Paper Inquiry Assignments: 5 Pages Paper (structure will follow the format set out in Boylan, Critical Inquiry).
In the Inquiry Assignments you will be asked to:
1. Formulate and/or respond to (a) question(s), determine a strategy, and formulate a methodology to
examine the inquiry question(s).
2. Identify and explore existing knowledge relevant to the question
3. Analyze, evaluate, and synthesize information from source(s) to support your inquiry project.
4. Draw independent conclusion(s) that integrate(s) new information with previous knowledge.
5. Communicate findings by formally presenting the results of the inquiry project through a combination of
written work, discussion,

The Book

When you click on The Book, Click on the picture of the book, and it will take you to the whole book. The “Pro” and “Con” Essay Format
Pro Essay (5 pages)
Pro Introduction: The author (fill in) argues for the following controversial conclusion: (give
conclusion). He supports this conclusion with the following premises: (a) (give first premise)
and (b) (give second premise). This essay will examine each premise in the light of objectors
and then defend the author from these objections.
The possible objection to the first premise (give the objection(s)).
Reply to the first objection (give pointed reply).
The possible objection to the second premise (give the objection(s)).
Reply to the second objection (give pointed reply).
Theoretical observation (this is a broad theoretical groundwork upon which the whole argument
rests)
Significance (this is a concrete example from the world in which these issues play out today).
Con Essay (5 pages)
Con Introduction: The author (fill in) argues for the following controversial conclusion (give
conclusion). He bases his argument on two objectionable premises: (a) (give first premise) and
(b) (give second premise). It will be the contention of this essay that these premises are mistaken
thus rendering the conclusion unproven.
Objection to the first premise (give objection).
Counter-refutation by the author (imagine how the author would respond to your objection)
Counter-refutation against the author (show how the author’s response is inadequate)
Objection to the second premise (give objection).
Counter-refutation by the author (imagine how the author would respond to your objection)
Counter-refutation against the author (show how the author’s response is inadequate)
Theoretical observation (this is a broad theoretical groundwork upon which the whole argument
rests)
Significance (this is a concrete example from the world in which these issues play out today).

Purchase answer to see full
attachment