San Jose State University The US Army Presence in Japan Essay In short, the essay should include some sort of argument; that is a thesis, plus the positive

San Jose State University The US Army Presence in Japan Essay In short, the essay should include some sort of argument; that is a thesis, plus the positive and negative reasons for thinking that your thesis is reasonable, plausible, worth further consideration, or even true. Also, the paper should deal with at least one of the required course texts and use both the required text and secondary materials to explain and evaluate an issue or controversy in this subject. Detailed instructions for the body paragraphs and bibliography are uploaded. Please follow those guidelines. If anything is unclear, please let me know! Thank you. Topic: The U.S. military presence in Japan has negative influence on the citizen’s peace.
I.
B: 3 articles
1) Green, Michael J. “The US-Japan Alliance: A Brief Strategic History.” The Association
for Asian Studies, The Association for Asian Studies, Inc, 2007, aas2.asianstudies.org/EAA/EAA-Archives/12/3/766.pdf.
–
The article explains the history of why the U.S. possesses many stations in Japan which is
needed to educate the reader with the background for further discussion.
2) Chanlett-Avery, Emma, and Ian E Rinehart. “The U.S. Military Presence in Okinawa and
the Futenma Base Controversy.” DEFENSE TECHNICAL INFORMATION
CENTER, LIBRARY OF CONGRESS WASHINGTON DC CONGRESSIONAL
RESEARCH SERVICE, 3 Aug. 2012,
apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a585507.pdf.
–
This article argues about issues Okinawa, Japan constantly has with the U.S. military. I
will use this to bring up problems for the citizens to live around U.S. force stations.
3) Mitchell, Jon. “U.S. Marine Corps Sexual Violence on Okinawa.” The Asia-Pacific
Journal: Japan Focus, 1 Feb. 2018, apjjf.org/2018/03/Mitchell.html.
II.
This atricle shows multiple incidents happened associated with the U.S. military in Japan.
A: 3 articles from newspapers
1) “Thousands Rally in Okinawa to Urge Tokyo and Washington to Scrap Base Relocation
Plan.” The Japan Times, KYODO JIJI, 16 Mar. 2019,
www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2019/03/16/national/politics-diplomacy/thousandsrally-okinawa-urge-tokyo-washington-scrap-base-relocationplan/#.XcNFtUVKg6U.
–
The article is about citizens in Okinawa opposing landfill to make another station for the
U.S. army.
2) “Okinawa Rape and Murder: US Military Base Worker Shinzato Jailed in Japan.” BBC
News, BBC, 1 Dec. 2017, www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-42192571.
–
A news article about a specific sexual assault committed by the U.S. marine.
3) Rich, Motoko. “U.S. Returns Some Okinawa Land to Japan, but Unease Endures.” The
New York Times, The New York Times, 22 Dec. 2016,
www.nytimes.com/2016/12/22/world/asia/us-japanokinawa.html?searchResultPosition=1.
III.
The news is about protesting for the U.S. military presence in Japan.
Violence, Peace, and Peace Research by Johan Galtung
–
I will use the article as references of states of peace.
INSTRUCTION
You are to write a medium-length (approximately seven to ten (7 – 10) pages, typed, double
spaced) essay on atopic of your choice which is relevant to the subject-matter of this course.
Your paper should deal with at least one (but oftentimes more) of the required course
texts, and use both the required text (or texts) and secondary materials (in, for example,
philosophy and political theory, or peace studies, or political science, international relations and
other social sciences. such as economics or history) to explain and evaluate an issue or
controversy in this subject.’
Most importantly, your essay Should include some sort of argument’, that is, a thesis, plus
your reasons for thinking that your thesis is reasonable, plausible, worth further consideration,
or (even) true. These reasons, both positive and negative, will include, for example, some or all
of the following: logical considerations, moral and philosophical considerations, contemporary
empirical data, historical evidence, or theoretical considerations arising from the social sciences,
all assembled in a coherent manner. Your personal opinions, or your personal ‘feelings.” by
themselves and unsupported, are irrelevant in writing this paper, though they may provide a
starting-point for your writing or a helpful check on the course of your reasoning. As should be
clear. there are many possible ways to successfully complete this assignment, not a single “right”
one.
Having said that, many students find a writing assignment in a philosophy class a difficult
one. One common temptation is to try to do too much, and the result is an unfocussed and
superficial paper in which (say) all aspects of peace have been mentioned but nothing much has
been shown to be more plausible than anything else. The writer has, perhaps, said a lot, but
neglected to make an argument supporting a specific thesis.
Another common temptation is to tell a story but without using the story to do anything
besides entertain or titillate. Stories are fine, but you are telling that story to make some
specific point, so make it clear ultimately to the instructor, but first of all to yourself– what
the point of your story is.
Your goal in this paper, rather than bare surveying or bare storytelling, is (as I said above)
to make an argument.
One more-or-less straightforward way of doing this is to use the theoretical apparatus of
the course text (or texts) to analyze a situation which the textbook does not analyze. Looking
ahead in the semester a bit, for example, in Just and Unjust Wars Michael Walzer sets out a
moral framework for evaluating the justice or injustice of using force in war (the theory of the
just war, or just ad bello). Except for the Prefaces, however, this book was written in the 1970s,
before the U.S. went to war with Iraq in 1991 and 2003; you could write a paper in which you
apply the theory of jus ad bello as explained by Walzer to a later war and evaluate its (in)justice.
Or, alternatively, you might make your paper a critique of one of the course texts. using
the secondary literature on that text and on that subject-matter to provide support for your critique.
“Critique” may be positive or negative; that is, you may argue that some claim or set of claims
in the course text (or texts) is plausible (positive), or argue that some claim or set of claims in
the course
text or texts is not plausible (negative), but either way you are attempting to assess the strength of
the arguments which Could be or have been made relative to some specific claim about peace, the
absence of peace, peace movements, etc. For example, Walter’s analysis is sometimes criticized as
being too nation-state-centric, applicable more to state-to-state conflicts such as the Second World
War but less applicable to the sorts of “‘asymmetric” conflicts involving groups like al Qaeda or the
Islamic State. Is that criticism a fair one? If so, could Waller’s framework be modified to account
tar and explain the moral dimensions of such conflicts, or not?
Be sure to attribute ideas, and the expressions of those ideas, to their original authors,
properly cited. Use one of the standard citation and formatting styles (APA, Chicago!Turabian, or
MLA): if you don’t have a preference among these three, use Chicago,Turabian as a default. The
Online Writing Lab at Purdue University has a useful set of materials on all three of these styles;
you can access these materials via the Internet at https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/section/2/.
BIBLIOGRAPHY REQUIREMENTS
As a part of your work on this paper, you will need to produce a preliminary
bibliography of sources, with a brief annotation of each item. This preliminary
bibliography must include at least the following:
I. First, provide sources satisfying one of the following two requirements (which one is
appropriate will depend upon the topic you are addressing):
Three (3) articles from an academic (peer-reviewed) philosophical journal
relevant to the general topic you are addressing. or [not both]
(B)
Three (3) articles from an academic (peer-reviewed) social-sciences or
historical journal, Or academic (usually, student-edited) law review. relevant to the general
topic you are addressing.
(A)
Please note that book reviews, short notes. encyclopedia or Wikipedia articles. and pretty
much anything you find online with a standard do NOT satisfy either I (A) or I (B) in an
acceptable manner.
Il. Second (and, again, which one is appropriate will depend upon the topic you are
addressing), provide sources satisfying one of the following two requirements:
(A) Three (3) articles (at least 750 words in length: editorials. op-eds, letters.
etc.. excluded) in a national newspaper from the United States or Great Britain (i.e.. the
New York Times, the Washington Post. the Wall Street Journal. or the Los Angeles
Times, or The Guardian (U.K. published within the past five years. relevant to the
general issue you are addressing, or
(B) One book (which may be philosophical. social-science. or historical. legal,
journalistic, etc.), published within the past ten years. which is reasonably reliable and
relevant to the general issue you are addressing. Please note the point about reliability:
this assignment is. in part. a test of your ability to distinguish reliable sources from
everything else that’s on the Internet.
Ill. And third. state at least one book, book chapter, Or article from the required course
reading which connects to your paper topic.
To summarize: each student should submit a bibliography containing of between
five and seven items.
You should provide a full citation for each item, and provide a one- or twosentence summary of the article, chapter. or book, showing why this source looks
relevant to your issue. A “full citation” does nor mean a URL only, it means, for
academic or law review article (to take one example out of several), an author, a title. a
journal title, the volume number of the journal. the date of publication. and relevant
page numbers. plus a URL where appropriate. All citations should be done in one of the
standard formats (APA, Chicagorrurahian, or MLA). If you don’t have a preference
among these three. use Chicagorrurahian.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment