Northwestern Employee Discrimination Case & Debate on Employees Drug Testing Paper In this case I am the Plaintiff, this one is about discrimination Read

Northwestern Employee Discrimination Case & Debate on Employees Drug Testing Paper In this case I am the Plaintiff, this one is about discrimination

Read Chapter 5 Managing Diverse Employees in a Multicultural Environment
Read Chapter 6 Managing in the Global Environment
Complete Debate
Week 7 – Discrimination

Plaintiff

Martha

Angelika ********

Defendant

Aisha

Ashley

Debate Guidelines and Hints

Overview and Instructions

For each debate, Two people will argue the Plaintiff in the case and Two people will argue the defendant in the case. Each person is responsible for debating individually.

1. The debate will follow this structure:

· Plaintiff opening (two paragraphs)

· Plaintiff recommended outcome of case (two paragraphs)

· Defendant opening (two paragraphs)

· Defendant recommended outcome of case (two paragraphs)

2. Each person must debate pending laws chosen weekly and describe your major arguments and the facts supporting each argument. A bibliography of sources used should also be included.

3. Read the law and debate your stance on the law as a plaintiff (for the employee) or Defendant (for the employer).

4. Use the law to argue your case

Week 7 – Discrimination https://www.cqstatetrack.com/texis/redir?id=5c417d16173c

Number:

IN [R] HB 1577 – Updated (Status 03/27/2019)

Sponsor:

Rep. Mara Candelaria Reardon.

Title:

Workplace discrimination.

Abstract:

Expands the definition of “”employer””, for purposes of civil rights enforcement, to include any person employing one or more persons within the state. (Current law defines “”employer”” to include any person employing six or more persons within the state.)

Status:

First reading: referred to Committee on Judiciary – 01/17/2019

Read the Law, debate on the Status of the Law. Use your weekly reading as a resource, and well as the law itself.

This is the second debate on employer drug test and I am the defendant in this case

For each debate, Two people will argue the Plaintiff in the case and Two people will argue the defendant in the case. Each person is responsible for debating individually.

1. The debate will follow this structure:

· Plaintiff opening (two paragraphs)

· Plaintiff recommended outcome of case (two paragraphs)

· Defendant opening (two paragraphs)

· Defendant recommended outcome of case (two paragraphs)

2. Each person must debate pending laws chosen weekly and describe your major arguments and the facts supporting each argument. A bibliography of sources used should also be included.

3. Read the law and debate your stance on the law as a plaintiff (for the employee) or Defendant (for the employer).

4. Use the law and your book chapters to argue your case http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/billstatus.asp?DocNum=1589&GAID=15&GA=101&DocTypeID=SB&LegID=118619&SessionID=108

Number: IL [R] SB 1589 – Updated (Status 03/28/2019)Sponsor: Sen. Jil Tracy (R-IL)Title: PUBLIC WORKS SUBSTANCE ABUSEAbstract: Amends the Substance Abuse Prevention on Public Works Projects Act. Provides that oral fluid tests and hair tests may be administered to test for drug use. Effective immediately.Status: Rule 3-9(a) / Re-referred to Assignments – 03/28/2019

Week 9 Employer Drug Test

Plaintiff

Martha

Aisha

Defendant

Angelika******

Ashley