ELU 0033 University of Leeds The Future of English Annotated Bibliography Write out the full reference for each source accurately, in alphabetical order, i

ELU 0033 University of Leeds The Future of English Annotated Bibliography Write out the full reference for each source accurately, in alphabetical order, in accordance with the Harvard referencing style found on the skills@library webpages. Writing the reference accurately is part of the task with marks awarded accordingly.

Write a summary and evaluation of each source which should include the following information:

What type of resource is this (academic/journalistic, book/article/news clip) and who is the intended audience? Is it up-to-date? Is it reliable?Any (relevant) information about the author?
What is the main focus of the source?
In what ways is the source useful in answering the essay question? To what extent is it relevant, and why? Here you can consider whether it provides a general overview or describes one aspect of the topic and even which part of the essay question it might help you write. For example, does it examine the main factors leading to the globalisation of English or does it focus on (a) specific endangered language(s)?

Write out the full reference for each source accurately, in accordance with the Leeds University Harvard referencing style found on the skills@library webpages. Make sure your references are in alphabetical order. Writing the reference accurately is part of the task with marks awarded accordingly.

Reflection

There is no specified word limit for the reflection task. On completion of your annotated bibliography, you should write a reflection on how difficult/easy you found it, which skills you feel were tested, and what you think you need to work on to make this type of task easier in future. You should submit this within 24 hours of completing the annotated bibliography via the turnitin tool in ‘Submit my Work’ folder of the ELU0033 area on Minerva.

The annotated bibliography with reflection is worth 20% of your mark for this module.

Please refer to the assessment criteria on Minerva.

Please use double spacing and 12 point font.

PLEASE CHECK THE ATTACHMENT BELOW IT WELL EXPLAIN EVERYTHING. © UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS
ELU0033 Academic Study Skills
Contemporary Global Issues 2: Annotated Bibliography
Task
Write an annotated bibliography for the assignment title below.
Outline the main reasons why English has become a global language, and discuss the
extent to which this has led to the extinction of minority languages. Use examples to
illustrate your answer.
Word Length
900 words (reference information is NOT included in the word
count).
Aim
To write an annotated bibliography relating to three sources
relevant to this essay question.
Sources
The annotated bibliography must include the following 2 sources:
• The Future of English? by David Graddol
This source can be downloaded from Minerva or free from:
https://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/attachments/books-thefuture-of-english.pdf.
• English as a Global Language; Threat or Opportunity for Minority Languages? By
Afsaneh Majidi
Available on Minerva or as a PDF file from:
http://www.mcser.org/journal/index.php/mjss/article/view/1267/1296
You should also find 1 additional source which is relevant to the assignment title, and
which would also provide useful information relating to the essay question.
N.B.**You must not use any sources which we have covered in class or sources
which are part of the reading list for the assessed seminar discussion. It is your
responsibility to check this**.
Instructions
Write out the full reference for each source accurately, in alphabetical order, in
accordance with the Harvard referencing style found on the skills@library webpages.
Writing the reference accurately is part of the task with marks awarded
accordingly.
Write a summary and evaluation of each source which should include the following
information:
• What type of resource is this (academic/journalistic, book/article/news clip) and
who is the intended audience? Is it up-to-date? Is it reliable? Any (relevant)
information about the author?
• What is the main focus of the source?
• In what ways is the source useful in answering the essay question? To what
extent is it relevant, and why? Here you can consider whether it provides a
general overview or describes one aspect of the topic and even which part of the
essay question it might help you write. For example, does it examine the main
factors leading to the globalisation of English or does it focus on (a) specific
endangered language(s)?
Write out the full reference for each source accurately, in accordance with the Leeds
University Harvard referencing style found on the skills@library webpages. Make sure
your references are in alphabetical order. Writing the reference accurately is part of the
task with marks awarded accordingly.
Reflection
There is no specified word limit for the reflection task. On completion of your annotated
bibliography, you should write a reflection on how difficult/easy you found it, which skills
you feel were tested, and what you think you need to work on to make this type of task
easier in future. You should submit this within 24 hours of completing the annotated
bibliography via the turnitin tool in ‘Submit my Work’ folder of the ELU0033 area on
Minerva.
The annotated bibliography with reflection is worth 20% of your mark for this
module.
Please refer to the assessment criteria on Minerva.
Please use double spacing and 12 point font.
Submission Instructions
Please submit an electronic copy of your annotated bibliography via the turnitin tool in
the ‘Assessment’ folder of the ELU0033 area on Minerva by 12 noon on Monday 9th
December 2019.
You should submit an electronic copy of your reflection on the annotated bibliography
task via the turnitin tool in the ‘Assessment’ folder of the ELU0033 area on Minerva by
12 noon on Tuesday 10th December 2019.
2
Please save your work as Word Document (.docx) or PDF unless otherwise instructed.
Please name your file with your Student ID, module code and assessment type, e.g.
200123456_ELU0033_Annotated_Bibliography.docx
Please also include your Student ID in the ‘Submission title’ field in the Minerva
submission point.
PLEASE DO NOT ASK THIRD PARTIES INCLUDING NATIVE SPEAKERS TO
CHECK OR PROOF-READ YOUR WORK.
Late Penalties
University rules on penalties for late submission of coursework require 5 full marks to be
deducted for every period of 24 hours or part thereof (including weekends) that passes
after the date of required submission. This means that work submitted within 24 hours
of the deadline is deducted 5 marks; work submitted between 24 and 48 hours late is
deducted 10 marks, and so on.
Extension Requests
If extenuating circumstances prevent you from submitting coursework by the deadline
you must apply for an extension. Deadline extensions for your assessments are
normally only given in advance and in cases of genuine medical or similarly serious
reasons.
A Coursework Extension form is available in the ‘Assessments’ area of Minerva for
ELU0033. The form should be submitted to the Language Centre Reception (15
Blenheim Terrace) or via email to langc@leeds.ac.uk. Extension requests will be
acknowledged via email then forwarded to the appropriate person in your subject. The
Language Centre Student Support team will inform you of the outcome via email.
Discussing your circumstances with a personal tutor or module leader DOES NOT
constitute an application for an extension and individual module tutors do NOT have
authority to grant extensions.
Declaration of Academic Integrity and Plagiarism
Whether submitting in hard copy or electronically via Minerva, you must complete a
declaration of academic integrity. The Turnitin tool on Minerva includes its own
electronic declaration of academic integrity.
By signing the declaration of academic integrity, you confirm that the work being
submitted is entirely your own. Presenting someone else’s work as your own is viewed
by the University plagiarism and is taken very seriously. The penalties imposed can
3
vary from receiving a mark of zero (on the 0 -100 scale) for a piece of work, to exclusion
from the University.
Asking a native speaker or other third party to check or proof-read your work also
constitutes plagiarism and is taken very seriously.
For more information, see the University’s Guide to Plagiarism:
www.ldu.leeds.ac.uk/plagiarism/
The University’s procedures for dealing with cases of suspected plagiarism are clearly
detailed at:
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/secretariat/student_cases.html
Students with specific learning disabilities
Students with specific learning disabilities should remember to include a ‘Marking
awareness coversheet’, available from the assessments folder in the Languages,
Cultures and Societies Organisation on Minerva. This should be pasted electronically
into the front of the coursework, and included with any hard copy submissions.
4

Purchase answer to see full
attachment