Performance Management and Monitoring on Work Performance Report The objectives of the report: 1- meaning of ‘strategic performance management’. 2- To id

Performance Management and Monitoring on Work Performance Report The objectives of the report:

1- meaning of ‘strategic performance management’.

2- To identify how performance management effect on quality and productivity.

identify importance of monitoring on work performance.

References:

– Harvard style of references.

– Studies between 2014 – 2019

– 50 references Topic: performance management.
The objectives of the report:
1- meaning of ‘strategic performance management’.
2- To identify how performance management effect on quality and productivity.
identify importance of monitoring on work performance.
There are various theories of performance management can be used on the report:
Goal Setting theory,
Expectancy theory,
Control theory,
Justice theory,
social cognitive theory
————————————————————————————————————————–
Literature Review
Evidence of wide reading using appropriate sources should be illustrated.
The literature is critically evaluated (in the context of the aim) rather than summarised or discussed.
– The review should conclude with a clear conceptual framework (e.g. key themes with which to look at
the examples / case studies.)
Case Study/Examples:
This section concerns the application of knowledge to chosen case study organisations or examples. In
all cases these case studies/examples MUST be based on secondary information sources.
–
The examples/cases should be carefully chosen to reflect both the overall topic area and the
aim.
Case studies should be described clearly
There should be clear links made between the examples /cases and the literature investigated.
For example, where examples/cases are doing what the literature suggests, or where they are
not, or partially. The similarity/differences should form the basis of a clear discussion.
Discussion
–
knowledge derived from the literature review, and
the results of the case/examples.
The ‘discussion’ should concern bringing all of this together and synthesising what has been
found. Can reasons for differences between theory and practice be identified for example? To
what extent is the context important (and perhaps not recognised, or identified, sufficiently
within the literature)?
Conclusion and Recommendations
The conclusion should likewise be looking specifically as to what extent the original aim has been
satisfied – did the project achieve what it set out to achieve
–
–
References to the original objectives would support the argument. All of this should be based on
the work evidenced in the project and should not rely on new ideas/information suddenly
introduced at this stage.
Any recommendations should be clearly based on the discussion/conclusion. They should be
practical/applied in nature.
References:
–
Harvard style of references.
Studies between 2014 – 2019
50 references

Purchase answer to see full
attachment