NSG6002 South University Wk 4 Policy Influences Clinical Practice Discussion My State is Texas Health Policy Paper Forward the topic of the health policy

NSG6002 South University Wk 4 Policy Influences Clinical Practice Discussion My State is Texas

Health Policy Paper

Forward the topic of the health policy paper to faculty at the end of Week One,

Health policy unfolds daily and drives clinical practice in the US. The student will investigate current policies or legislation underway for a specific health-related issue. The Student will develop a scholarly APA formatted paper supported by evidence. The policy paper rubric:

Introduction to population or problem (incidence, prevalence, epidemiology, cost burden etc)

Description of how the policy is intended for a specific population, program or organization

Specific legislators involved in the policy development and dissemination

Identify the role of the APRN in assisting with the policy or refuting the policy – this requires the evidence to support opinion, ideas and/or concepts.

Discuss how the policy influences clinical practice and is used to promote best outcomes

Examine how the policy can be used by the interprofessional team to ensure coordinated and comprehensive care for the specific population

Conclusion – summarize findings

APA format – use of primary peer-reviewed references as much as possible

Submission Details:
Support your responses with examples.
Cite any sources in APA format.
Submit your document to the Submissions Area by the due date assigned. Rubric Name: NSG6002 Week 4 Project Rubric
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names
and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
Unsatisfactory
51 points
Satisfactory
59 points
Proficient
66 points
Exemplary
75 points
Health Topic Describe a single health promotion/disease prevention problem from the Healthy
People 2020 Objectives Introduction to population or problem Describe incidence, prevalence,
epidemiology, cost burden etc.,
Student did not submit assignment
Work minimally meets assignment expectations. No purpose statement is provided.
Assignment meets some expectations with minimal depth and breath. Purpose statement is
vague.
Assignment meets most of expectations with all components being addressed in good depth and
breadth. Purpose statement is present and appropriate for the assignment.
Assignment meets all expectations with exceptional depth and breath. A comprehensive purpose
statement delineates all requirements of the assignment.
/ 75
Description of specific population, program or organization Discuss how the policy is intended
for a specific population, program or organization Specific legislators involved Identify and
discuss specific legislators involved in the policy development and
Student did not submit assignment
Shows some degree of understanding of assignment concepts.
Demonstrates a clear understanding of assignment concepts.
Demonstrates the ability to evaluate and apply key assignment concepts.
Demonstrates the ability to evaluate, apply and integrate key assignment concepts.
/ 75
Policy, practice and outcomes Discuss how the policy influences clinical practice and is used to
promote best outcomes Policy, practice and the inter-professional team Examine how the policy
can be used by the inter-professional team to ensure coordinated
Student did not submit assignment
Does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.
Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.
Provides minimal justification to support major topics. Uses 1 credible resource in the
assignment.
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from
sources to support major points presented. Uses a minimum of 2 credible resources in the
assignment.
Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from
sources to support major points presented. Uses 3 credible resources for the assignment,
including at least 1 scholarly peer-reviewed resource.
/ 75
This table lists criteria and criteria group name in the first column. The first row lists level names
and includes scores if the rubric uses a numeric scoring method.Criteria
No Evidence
0 points
Unsatisfactory
16 points
Satisfactory
19 points
Proficient
21 points
Exemplary
25 points
Comprehensive Review of Literature Perform and demonstrate a comprehensive review of the
current evidence. Use of primary sources and evidence that is not older than 5 years Writing,
grammar and APA application Scholarly grammar, use of APA 6th edition fo
Student did not submit assignment
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors that interfere with the
reader’s understanding.
Contains a few (3-4) grammar, spelling, punctuation and APA errors.
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Contains a few (1–2) APA
format errors.
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Uses correct APA format with
no errors.
/ 25
Total
/ 250

Purchase answer to see full
attachment