KIPP Houston Public Schools Organizational Strengths Case 9 Analysis Read KIPP Houston Public Schools, Case 9 For this case analysis, you should prepare a
KIPP Houston Public Schools Organizational Strengths Case 9 Analysis Read KIPP Houston Public Schools, Case 9
For this case analysis, you should prepare a written analysis of 3 to 5 pages that uses the text and other credible sources as appropriate. Your paper should have 1″ margins, be double spaced, and use APA formats for
topic and subtopic headings
citations
references
Your case must minimally address the following issues / questions:
Summarize the organizational strengths and core competencies which distinguish KIPP Houston from its competitors. Does the new regional structure advance or interfere with the goals of the organization?
What are the weaknesses of KIPP Houston’s internal operations? Compare the organization’s performance to the achievements of its competitors. What steps have been taken to manage its problem areas?
Describe the factors in the external environment which affect the charter organization’s ability to meet its objectives. Discuss KIPP Houston’s current expansion goals.
Describe and consider Ali’s strategic posture on the major issues facing KIPP Houston. Based on your analysis, do you agree with her judgment? What additional recommendations can you make to guide the organization’s strategy and actions？
I have upload three pictures, the Case 9 is the material of this assignment, the 01 and 02 are the requirements of this assignment. Please finish this homework in your own word, please turnitin before you give me the answer, Plagiarism rate cannot over 3%. Please make sure that the answers you give me are unique and do not give the same answer to two people. And solve this assignment in high quality please, if the answer is good, I will give you high tips. make sure you can solve this in 24 hours. Kipp Houston Public Schools
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
Analysis of
internal strengths
and core
competencies
6.0 pts
Superior: Exceeds
expectations and
thoughtfully
assesses the
potential impact of
the expanding
regional structure.
5.0 pts
Proficient: Analysis
thoroughly describes
the relevant strengths
and core competencies
which distinguish KIPP
Houston from its
competitors.
4.0 pts
Competent: Analysis
includes significant
strengths and core
competencies which
distinguish KIPP
Houston from its
competitors.
2.0 pts
Needs Improvement:
Analysis excludes some of
the relevant strengths
and core competencies
which distinguish KIPP
Houston from its
competitors.
6.0 pts
Analysis of
internal
weaknesses
6.0 pts
Exceeds
expectations, fully
exploring and
recognizing
competitor
achievements which
impact KIPP’s
success in the
marketplace.
5.0 pts
Analysis thoroughly
describes KIPP
Houston’s internal
weaknesses and
demonstrates a full
understanding of the
steps being taken to
overcome them.
4.0 pts
Analysis includes
significant
weaknesses of KIPP
Houston’s internal
operations and the
steps being taken to
manage these
weaknesses.
2.0 pts
Analysis excludes
some of the
weaknesses of KIPP
Houston’s internal
operations and/or the
steps being taken to
manage these
weaknesses.
6.O pts
4.0 pts
Analysis of
external
environmental
conditions
6.0 pts
Exceeds expectations
and provides an
outstanding critique
of the organization’s
current expansion
goals.
5.0 pts
Analysis fully and
accurately describes the
external factors which
affect the organization’s
ability to meet its
objectives.
Analysis describes
external factors
which affect the
organization’s
ability to meet its
objectives.
2.0 pts
Analysis fails to
describe some of the
external factors which
affect the organization’s
ability to meet its
objectives
6.0 pts
6.0 pts
3.0 pts
Strategic intent
and
recommendations
7.0 pts
Exceeds expectations
and offers
extraordinary
suggestions to guide
the organization’s
strategy and actions.
Response fully considers Ali’s
strategic posture on major issues
facing KIPP Houston, citing her
experience, training, and body of
results to credit her judgment.
5.0 pts
Response
considers Ali’s
strategic
posture on
major issues
facing KIPP
Houston.
Response does not
fully consider Ali’s
strategic posture
on major issues
facing KIPP
Houston.
7.0 pts
4.0 pts
Grammar,
Writing, APA
Format
5.0 pts
Information is appropriately
sequenced with topical
headings and subheadings.
Language use, grammar,
spelling, and punctuation
are at an appropriate
graduate level, with no
errors. Uses paragraph form
with topical sentences that
are supported by the
remainder of the paragraph,
and effective transitions.
Writing is clear, concise, and
in correct voice and tense.
Correct application of APA
format. NO errors in
citations and references.
Information is
appropriately
sequenced with topical
headings. Language
use, grammar, spelling,
and punctuation are at
an appropriate
graduate level. Uses
paragraph form with
topical sentences that
are supported by the
remainder of the
paragraph. Writing is
clear and concise.
Somewhat correct
application of APA
format. Two to three
errors in citations and
references.
3.0 pts
There is some order
to the information
with some heading
usage. Presentation
has two to four
misspellings or
grammar errors, or
two or three word
use errors. Uses
paragraph form but
sentences within
the paragraph may
not be related.
Somewhat correct
application of APA
format. Four to six
errors in citations
and references.
1.0 pts
Limited structure
or no topical
headings used.
Presentation has
more than four
misspellings or
grammar errors, or
more than four
word use errors.
Language use
makes it difficult
to understand the
intended meaning.
Incorrect
application of APA
format. Several
errors in or
missing citations
and references.
5.0 pts
Total Points: 30.0
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
