? E Oman Electronic Government System Exploratory Study Write a report about “An Exploratory Study on E-Oman: User Perspective” consist of 2500 words. An

? E Oman Electronic Government System Exploratory Study Write a report about “An Exploratory Study on E-Oman: User Perspective” consist of 2500 words.

And I’ve uploaded attachment named “Structure” to know how to write and which headlines includes. Plus, I’ve uploaded another attachment named “Example” you can make same steps which has been done inside it.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
? E Oman Electronic Government System Exploratory Study Write a report about “An Exploratory Study on E-Oman: User Perspective” consist of 2500 words. An
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay

*** Words count = 2500 words.

*** In-Text Citations and References using Harvard style.

*** I’ve uploaded two attachments named “Structure” and “Example”. Mobile Phone Forensics
Implementation and Analysis
by Issa Al Balushi (15201179)
FILE
7209_ISSA_AL_BALUSHI__15201179__MOBILE_PHONE_FORENSICS_IMPL
EMENT AT ION_AND_ANALYSIS_29631_720588035.DOCX (1.98M)
T IME SUBMIT T ED
18-DEC-2017 10:58PM (UT C+0400)
WORD COUNT
3679
SUBMISSION ID
897383372
CHARACT ER COUNT
21293
Mobile Phone Forensics Implementation and Analysis
GRADEMARK REPORT
FINAL GRADE
GENERAL COMMENTS
88
Instructor
First Marker: Dr Ramalingam
/100
It’s an outstanding abstract no f law f ound. Student
has implemented mobile phone f orensics and report
this report. Introduction is appropriate excellent
literature review f or causes the wide variety of
resources with citations analysis implementation and
discussion is appropriate outstanding logical
Sequencing is there appropriate. All the other
sections also excellent outstanding. T his report is
selected to be published in a research paper.
2nd Marker Agrees to First Marker marks and
comments
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
RUBRIC: ET 2A SEP 17 JAN 18
ABST RACT (10%)
8 8 .0 0 / 10 0
100 / 100
Abstract of the report in 100 to 150 words (10 Marks)
SUB STANDARD / NO Abstract not f ound
ATTEMP
(0)
POOR
(20)
Abstract f ails to concentrate of the report. Just f illed with text which is totally out of
scope of the report
SATISFACTORY (40 Abstract is very short or long ; similar to introduction;
MARKS)
(40)
GOOD
(50)
Abstract covers some part of the report whereas the reader has to read the report to
understand the purpose of the report
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
Very good abstract covering most of the report however the write-up can be f urther
improved
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
(70)
Excellent abstract which covers the whole report and impressing the reader
OUTSTANDING( 100 Outstanding abstract. No f law in writing. Conveying the purpose of the report in an
MARKS)
exceptional way.
(100)
INT RODUCT ION (10%)
70 / 100
SUB STANDARD / NO Student’s introduction of topic is missing.
ATTEMP
(0)
POOR
(20)
Student’s introduction of the topic is poor
SATISFACTORY (40 Student’s introduction of the topic is passable f or understanding the topic
MARKS)
(40)
GOOD
(50)
Student’s introduction of the topic is adequate f or understanding in terms of clarity
and thoroughness. Few details have been lef t out.
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
Student’s introduction of the topic is adequate f or understanding in terms of clarity
and thoroughness. No major detail has been lef t out.
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
Student’s introduction of the topic is clear and through. Every detail required to
understand the topic is included and clearly stated.
(70)
OUTSTANDING( 100 Exceptional work showcased by the student.
MARKS)
(100)
LIT . REVIEW (20%)
70 / 100
Literature review / Knowledge integration ( 20 Marks)
SUB STANDARD / NO No attempt is made by the student
ATTEMP
(0)
POOR
(20)
Poorly done literature review. Fails to review the sources and f ails to produce the
sensible literature ; totally illogical text is given
SATISFACTORY (40 T he report consists of paraphrased text f rom various sources missing logical f low
MARKS)
and coherence
(40)
GOOD
(50)
T he report has evidence of good literature review whereas the sources and points
discussed are not in-depth
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
T he report is logical in sequence whereas f urther improvement is required in
paraphrasing and summarisation to make it as strong argument
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
(70)
T he report has excellent ref erence to academically accepted sources ; logical
sequence of the report is f ound; clear justif ication is given
OUTSTANDING( 100 Brilliantly researched work supported with analytical study; All the resources are
MARKS)
prof essionally accepted and f rom well-known sources.
(100)
ANALYSIS: (15%)
100 / 100
Support of Research / Analysis ( 15 Marks)
SUB STANDARD / NO Not attempted/ No supporting data provided
ATTEMP
(0)
POOR
(20)
No f acts are provided/ Provided f acts are insignif icant/ irrelevant to the argument. No
logical integration is f ound
SATISFACTORY (40 Student attempted to f etch f acts and f igures but not f rom valid sources. Not all web
MARKS)
sites utilized are credible, and/or sources are not current.
(40)
GOOD
(50)
Student attempted to f etch f acts and f igures but logical integration is not adequate.
Fewer than 5 current sources, or f ewer than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles
or scholarly books.
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
Some valid f acts and f igures are included. Fewer than 5 current sources, or f ewer
than 2 of 5 are peer-reviewed journal articles or scholarly books. All web sites utilized
are credible.
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
(70)
Report ref ers to 5 current sources, of which at least 2 are peer-review journal articles
or scholarly books. All web sites utilized are authoritative. Most f acts and f igures are
signif icant.
OUTSTANDING( 100 Minimum of 5 latest sources, of which at least 3 are peer-review journal articles or
MARKS)
scholarly books. Sources include both general background sources and specialized
(100)
sources. Special-interest sources and popular literature are acknowledged as such if
they are cited. All web sites utilized are authoritative.
DISCUSSION (20%)
100 / 100
T opic Focus and Depth of Discussion ( 20 Marks)
SUB STANDARD / NO Not attempted
ATTEMP
(0)
POOR
(20)
T he topic is not clearly def ined. No discussion f ound or wrong direction of
discussion is f ound
SATISFACTORY (40 T he topic is too broad f or the scope of this assignment. Some points are discussed
MARKS)
with clear details.
(40)
GOOD
(50)
T he topic is too broad f or the scope of this assignment. T he writer has omitted
pertinent content or content runs-on excessively. Quotations f rom others outweigh
the writer’s own ideas excessively.
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
T he topic is f ocused but lacks direction. In-depth discussion & elaboration in most
sections of the paper.
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
(70)
T he topic is f ocused enough f or the scope of this assignment. Research statement
provides direction f or the paper. In-depth discussion & elaboration f ound in most
sections of the paper.
OUTSTANDING( 100 T he topic is f ocused narrowly enough f or the scope of this assignment. Research
MARKS)
statement provides direction f or the paper. In-depth discussion & elaboration f ound
(100)
in all sections of the paper.
COHERENCE / R (10%)
100 / 100
Coherence / Report Organisation / Conclusion
SUB STANDARD / NO Very bad organisation. No separation of sections, logical organisation is f ound.
ATTEMP
Unacceptable report.
(0)
POOR
No logical f low is f ound. Disjoint inf ormation without any logical sequence is f ound.
(20)
SATISFACTORY (40 Author sometimes ties together inf ormation f rom the sources. Paper does not f low MARKS)
disjointedness is apparent.
(40)
GOOD
(50)
Inf ormation ties together f or f ew sources. Paper f lows with only f ew joints.
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
Logical sequencing is ensured but more coherence and logical linking is required.
Author’s writing demonstrates the relationship among material obtained f rom some
sources.
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
(70)
Paper f lows f rom one issue to the next in logical order. Clear demarcation of each
discussion f ound. Author’s writing demonstrates the relationship among material
obtained f rom most sources.
OUTSTANDING( 100 Paper f lows f rom one issue to the next seamlessly and in logical order. Author’s
MARKS)
writing demonstrates the relationship among material obtained f rom all sources.
(100)
REP. ST RUCT UR (5%)
100 / 100
Report Structure, spelling, Grammar ( 5 Marks)
SUB STANDARD / NO Report is badly organized ; multiple f ont types are used ; no justif ication ; very bad in
ATTEMP
presence
(0)
POOR
(20)
Poor Structure ; lot of f ormatting errors and spelling mistakes are f ound
SATISFACTORY (40 May have random organization, lacking internal paragraph structure and use f ew or
MARKS)
inappropriate transitions. Paragraphs may lack topic sentences or main ideas, or may
(40)
be too general or too specif ic to be ef f ective. Paragraphs may not all relate to
paper’s subject.
GOOD
(50)
May list ideas or arrange them randomly rather than using logical structure. May use
transitions, but they are not in a logical sequence. While each paragraph may relate to
central idea, logic is not always clear. Paragraphs have topic sentences but may be
overly general, and arrangement of sentences within paragraphs may lack structure.
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
Shows a logical progression of ideas and uses f airly sophisticated transitional
devices; e.g., may move f rom least to more important idea. Some logical links may be
f aulty, but each paragraph clearly relates to paper’s central idea.
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
(70)
Uses a logical structure appropriate to paper’s subject and purpose. Sophisticated
transitional sentences of ten develop one idea f rom the previous one or identif y their
logical relations. It guides the reader through the chain of reasoning or progression
of ideas.
OUTSTANDING( 100 Prof essional touch is f ound in the report structure; Student’s ef f ort in f ormatting and
MARKS)
presenting the report is clearly visible. Each section is caref ully f ormatted and no
(100)
visible errors f ound.
REFERENCES (10%)
70 / 100
Citation & Ref erences ( 10 Marks)
SUB STANDARD / NO No ref erences are f ound
ATTEMP
(0)
POOR
(20)
General sites such as google , Wikipedia are given
SATISFACTORY (40 Identif y a f ew of the most signif icant articles.
MARKS)
(40)
GOOD
(50)
Identif y some of the most signif icant articles.
VERY GOOD (60
MARKS)
(60)
Identif y most of the most signif icant articles.
EXCELLENT (70
MARKS)
(70)
Identif ied all of the most signif icant articles.
OUTSTANDING( 100 Perf ect Harvard Style is used f or all citations
MARKS)
(100)
Abstract—This is the place where you will put the abstract. The abstract must summarize the
whole report starting with the purpose of the report, what are the major issues, what is the key
solution. The abstract must cover the whole report and be providing a summary of the report to
the reader. The reader should be able to understand the report just by reading the abstract. Use
100 to 150 words. Don’t use bullet points. Don’t have many paragraphs.
Keywords—identify and put 4 to 5 keywords about this topic
I. Introduction (Heading 1)
The purpose of introduction is to introduce the topic to the reader and express the need for this
study. Your writing must convince the reader to read the full report. Keep in mind that the reader
has no idea of what you are going to write or what you wrote. He /she is going to understand the
topic only by reading your introduction.
Please mention the organization of the report. Means, what is in the next section? It should
show the flow of the report.
You may use 200 to 250 words for this purpose in two or three paragraphs.
II. literature review
This section should be used to collect data and research finding from the literature. You need to
collect from academically accepted sources and avoid using Wikipedia and webopedia. All data,
information must be accompanying by in-text citation in Harvard Style.
Try to use few case studies. Try to include data and statistical information. Ensure the
paragraphs are logically constructed and have flow of information. Avoid disjoint paragraphs.
You may have 500 to 750 words in this section with multiple sub-sections.
III. analysis
Based on the literature review identify the major issues / drawbacks/ problems from the topic
and discuss in detail. Identify the root cause of the issue and describe it with possible details.
Support your argument with evidences such data from other researches. You can have a
maximum of 500 words for this section. Try to use tables and images to support your argument.
IIII. discussion
This is the most critical part of the research paper. Here you are going to suggest ways to fix the
issues that were identified in the analysis section.
Your discussion points can have supported data from internet sources to strengthen your
statement. You may also use data from surveys and other form of research output. You may
have a maximum of 500 words.
Table Head
Table Column Head
Table column subhead
Subhead
Subhead
copy
More table copya
Sample of a Table footnote. (Table footnote)
Fig. 1. Example of a figure caption. (figure caption)
V. conclusion
This section is used to summarize the key findings and gives future research directions.
References
List all references used in the research in Harvard style. Advised to use the latest sources (for
example since 2014).

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Homework On Time
Calculate the Price of your PAPER Now
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Choose Us

Top quality papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional academic writers

We have hired a team of professional writers experienced in academic and business writing. Most of them are native speakers and PhD holders able to take care of any assignment you need help with.

Free revisions

If you feel that we missed something, send the order for a free revision. You will have 10 days to send the order for revision after you receive the final paper. You can either do it on your own after signing in to your personal account or by contacting our support.

On-time delivery

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & confidential

We use several checkers to make sure that all papers you receive are plagiarism-free. Our editors carefully go through all in-text citations. We also promise full confidentiality in all our services.

24/7 Customer Support

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

You are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper. Our academic experts will gladly help you with essays, case studies, research papers and other assignments.

Admissions

Admission help & business writing

You can be positive that we will be here 24/7 to help you get accepted to the Master’s program at the TOP-universities or help you get a well-paid position.

Reviews

Editing your paper

Our academic writers and editors will help you submit a well-structured and organized paper just on time. We will ensure that your final paper is of the highest quality and absolutely free of mistakes.

Reviews

Revising your paper

Our academic writers and editors will help you with unlimited number of revisions in case you need any customization of your academic papers