BUS206 Southern New Legal System Court Jurisdiction Case Study Paper Everything is attached the case study and the template on which to go on BUS 206 Miles

BUS206 Southern New Legal System Court Jurisdiction Case Study Paper Everything is attached the case study and the template on which to go on BUS 206 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: Business law impacts our everyday lives, both personally and professionally. Businesses enter contracts, manufacture goods, sell services and products,
and engage in employment and labor practices—activities that must all adhere to certain laws and regulations. Recognizing and evaluating legal issues is a
fundamental skill that will help you navigate commercial relationships and avoid potential problems in the business world.
Prompt: Imagine yourself as a paralegal working in a law office that has been tasked with reviewing three current cases. You will review the case studies and
compose a short report for each, applying your legal knowledge and understanding of the types of business organizations. In each of the three reports, you will
focus on areas of law covered in this course. Case Study One focuses on the legal system, criminal law, and ethics.
Case Study One: Chris, Matt, and Ian, who live in California, have decided to start a business selling an aftershave lotion called Funny Face over the internet. They
contract with Novelty Now Inc., a company based in Florida, to manufacture and distribute the product. Chris frequently meets with a representative from
Novelty Now to design the product and to plan marketing and distribution strategies. In fact, to increase the profit margin, Chris directs Novelty Now to substitute
PYR (a low-cost chemical emulsifier) for the compound in Novelty Now’s original formula. PYR is not FDA approved. Funny Face is marketed nationally on the
radio and in newspapers, as well as on the web and Facebook. Donald Margolin, a successful CEO and public speaker, buys one bottle of Funny Face over the
internet. After he uses it once, his face turns a permanent shade of blue. Donald Margolin and his company, Donald Margolin Empire Inc., file suit in the
state of New York against Novelty Now Inc. and Chris, Matt, and Ian, alleging negligence and seeking medical costs and compensation for the damage to his face
and business reputation. It is discovered that PYR caused Margolin’s skin discoloration. The website for Funny Face states that anyone buying their product
cannot take Chris, Matt, and Ian to court. Novelty Now’s contract with the three men states that all disputes must be brought in the state of Florida.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
A. Apply the rules of jurisdiction to the facts of this case and determine what jurisdiction(s) would be appropriate for Margolin’s lawsuit against Funny Face
and Novelty Now, respectively. Consider federal court, state court, and long arm principles in your analysis.
B. Assume all parties agree to pursue alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of two types of ADR appropriate for
this case. Be sure to define the characteristics of each in your answer.
C. Applying what you have learned about ADR, which type would each party (Funny Face, Novelty Now, and Margolin) prefer and why?
D. Apply concepts of criminal law and discuss whether or not corporations and/or corporate officers may be held liable for criminal acts.
E. Identify, per the classification of crimes in the text, any potential criminal acts by Funny Face and/or Novelty Now.
F. Assume the use of the emulsifier PYR, at the direction of Chris, is a criminal offense. Apply concepts of criminal law and discuss the potential criminal
liability of Funny Face, Chris, Matt, Ian, and Novelty Now. Include support for your conclusion.
G. Apply at least three guidelines of ethical decision-making to evaluate ethical issues within the case study.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your submission should be a three- to six-page Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch
margins. Citations should be formatted according to APA style.
Critical Elements
Case Study One:
Rules of Jurisdiction
Exemplary (100%)
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
cites scholarly research to
support claims
Proficient (85%)
Correctly applies the rules of
jurisdiction to the facts of this
case and determines what
jurisdiction(s) would be
appropriate for Margolin’s
lawsuit against Funny Face and
Novelty Now
Case Study One:
Alternative Dispute
Resolution
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
offers insight, based on scholarly
research, as to why the chosen
types of ADR would be
appropriate choices in this
situation
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
offers concrete examples to
substantiate and
comprehensively describe why
the chosen types of ADR would
be preferred by the respective
parties
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
cites specific, applicable rules of
law
Analyzes the advantages and
disadvantages of two types of
ADR and defines the
characteristics of each
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and
ideas are well supported with
annotations from the text
Correctly identifies, per the
classification of crimes in the
text, any potential criminal acts
by Funny Face and/or Novelty
Now
Case Study One:
ADR Preference
Case Study One:
Criminal Acts
Case Study One:
Potential Criminal
Acts
Applies knowledge of ADR and
discusses which types of ADR
each party (Funny Face, Novelty
Now, and Margolin) might prefer
and logically defends choices
Applies concepts of criminal law
and discusses whether or not
corporations and/or corporate
officers may be held liable for
criminal acts
Needs Improvement (55%)
Applies the rules of jurisdiction
and determines what
jurisdiction(s) would be
appropriate for Margolin’s
lawsuit against Funny Face and
Novelty Now, but determination
of jurisdiction is incorrect for
this case
Analyzes the advantages and
disadvantages of two types of
ADR, but analysis is cursory or
does not define the
characteristics of each
Not Evident (0%)
Does not apply the rules of
jurisdiction or determine what
jurisdiction(s) would be
appropriate for Margolin’s
lawsuit
Value
13
Does not analyze the advantages
and disadvantages of two types
of ADR
13
Applies knowledge of ADR and
discusses which types of ADR
each party might prefer, but
discussion is cursory and/or
does not discuss reasons for
preferences, or defense is
illogical
Applies concepts of criminal law
and discusses whether or not
corporations and/or corporate
officers may be held liable for
criminal acts, but discussion is
cursory or lacks detail
Identifies any potential criminal
acts by Funny Face and/or
Novelty Now, but criminal acts
identified are incorrect for this
case
Does not apply knowledge of
ADR or discuss which types of
ADR each party might prefer
13
Does not apply concepts of
criminal law or discuss whether
or not corporations and/or
corporate officers may be held
liable for criminal acts
13
Does not identify any potential
criminal acts by Funny Face
and/or Novelty Now
13
Case Study One:
Potential Criminal
Liability
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
cites scholarly research to
support analysis
Applies concepts of criminal law
and discusses the potential
criminal liability of Funny Face,
Chris, Matt, Ian, and Novelty
Now and includes support for
the conclusion
Case Study One:
Ethical DecisionMaking
Meets “Proficient” criteria and
offers insight into the
relationship between ethics and
law
Accurately applies at least three
guidelines of ethical decisionmaking to evaluate ethical issues
within the context of the case
study
Articulation of
Response
Submission is free of errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, and
organization and is presented in
a professional and easy to read
format
Submission has no major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
Applies concepts of criminal law
and discusses the potential
criminal liability of Funny Face,
Chris, Matt, Ian, and Novelty
Now but does not include
support for the conclusion, or
support is weak
Applies at least three guidelines
of ethical decision-making to
evaluate ethical issues within
the context of the case study,
but application of guidelines has
gaps in accuracy or logic
Submission has major errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that negatively impact
readability and articulation of
main ideas
Does not apply concepts of
criminal law or discuss the
potential criminal liability of
Funny Face, Chris, Matt, Ian, and
Novelty Now
13
Does not apply at least three
guidelines of ethical decisionmaking to evaluate ethical issues
within the context of the case
study
13
Submission has critical errors
related to citations, grammar,
spelling, syntax, or organization
that prevent understanding of
ideas
9
Total
100%
BUS 206 Milestone One Template
To simplify completing this milestone, utilize this template to help you write your essay. You may use
each heading as a starter sentence and then discuss the legal issues presented in the fact pattern, using
the following terms. Be sure to explain and elaborate how each term applies to the story. Be sure to
incorporate the facts of the case into your explanation and analysis.
Remember that the document you submit should follow the formatting guidelines described in the
Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric document.
A. The appropriate court for this lawsuit depends upon several factors. Three important
considerations include the following:
1. Personal jurisdiction. Define personal jurisdiction and explain how it applies to the
facts of this case.
2. Subject matter jurisdiction. Define subject matter jurisdiction and explain how it
applies to the facts of this case.
3. Minimum contacts. Define minimum contacts and explain how it applies to the facts
of case.
(Chapter 3)
B. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) may be an option to resolve this dispute.
1. Define ADR.
(Chapter 4)
C. Language on the Funny Face website appears to limit any claim filed to arbitration as a means
of resolving the dispute.
1. Explain the pros and cons of arbitration for at least two parties to the case.
2. Explain mediation and whether it has any benefits in this case.
D., E., and F. Chris, Matt and Ian could be subject to corporate criminal liability. The primary
crime that exists in this case is that of fraud.
1. Define fraud and why or why not one or more parties might be held responsible for
this crime.
2. Can you identify any other defendants and/or possible crimes in the story?
Elaborate and explain.
(Chapter 7)
G. The ethical process of decision-making involves consideration of three key elements.
1. Identify the elements and discuss how they apply to some of the facts of this case.
(Chapter 3)

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
BUS206 Southern New Legal System Court Jurisdiction Case Study Paper Everything is attached the case study and the template on which to go on BUS 206 Miles
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay
Homework On Time
Calculate the Price of your PAPER Now
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Why Choose Us

Top quality papers

We always make sure that writers follow all your instructions precisely. You can choose your academic level: high school, college/university or professional, and we will assign a writer who has a respective degree.

Professional academic writers

We have hired a team of professional writers experienced in academic and business writing. Most of them are native speakers and PhD holders able to take care of any assignment you need help with.

Free revisions

If you feel that we missed something, send the order for a free revision. You will have 10 days to send the order for revision after you receive the final paper. You can either do it on your own after signing in to your personal account or by contacting our support.

On-time delivery

All papers are always delivered on time. In case we need more time to master your paper, we may contact you regarding the deadline extension. In case you cannot provide us with more time, a 100% refund is guaranteed.

Original & confidential

We use several checkers to make sure that all papers you receive are plagiarism-free. Our editors carefully go through all in-text citations. We also promise full confidentiality in all our services.

24/7 Customer Support

Our support agents are available 24 hours a day 7 days a week and committed to providing you with the best customer experience. Get in touch whenever you need any assistance.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

No need to work on your paper at night. Sleep tight, we will cover your back. We offer all kinds of writing services.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

You are welcome to choose your academic level and the type of your paper. Our academic experts will gladly help you with essays, case studies, research papers and other assignments.

Admissions

Admission help & business writing

You can be positive that we will be here 24/7 to help you get accepted to the Master’s program at the TOP-universities or help you get a well-paid position.

Reviews

Editing your paper

Our academic writers and editors will help you submit a well-structured and organized paper just on time. We will ensure that your final paper is of the highest quality and absolutely free of mistakes.

Reviews

Revising your paper

Our academic writers and editors will help you with unlimited number of revisions in case you need any customization of your academic papers