Critical Reflection Assignment | Get Paper Help

Answer one of these three prompts using the guidelines in the Critical Reflection Guidelines module.

Wilson asks: Can the Arts Offer Alternatives in Setting Research Agendas, Interpreting Results, and Communicating Findings? How did Bilal set an “alternative research agenda” for surveillance science and technology”? How did 3rdI encourage new ways to “interpret results” from surveillance practices? What new findings did the piece communicate? Make sure to discuss the Wilson and consider the “Art Characteristics Useful for Research” on page 38.

Connect the Festival Pattern Group public initiative with the Pugwash movement. Explain how the interest in the two and the emergence of the two by scientists working in emerging research techniques was not a coincidence. Be sure to consult readings on the FPG assigned and look up Pugwash online.

Discuss the ”science of design” concept. For Gropius and the Bauhaus movement, how was design of the 1920s a “science” and how and why was technology so important to their social and artistic movement? Apply some of Wilson’s questions to the Bauhaus approach, and consider the Gropius reading assigned for this week.

For each reflection, respond to the prompt in a discussion that takes into account one or more artwork(s), or the work of an artist, designer, or design group. Be sure that your discussion is informed by reading, the lecture, and the PowerPoint, and that is starts with a thesis, question, or argument. If your CR is not informed by the reading, you will lose points. If your CR does not have a thesis and simply recounts what the reading and lecture say, you will lose points. These are critical reflections, not rephrasing of what you read.
Start with a thesis, argument, or point. Does your CR have a point or argument? Is it a strong and clear point? Is it relevant to the week’s materials and discussion? Have you supported it with reading and lecture and materials shown?