Policy Practice Paper Assignment | Get Homework Help

Purpose The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate how you would use your critical thinking skills to formulate and advocate for policy change. Course Objectives CO 2: Use critical-thinking skills to integrate multiple sources of knowledge, data, and research to analyze social welfare policies. CO 3: Apply policy practice skills, in concert with clients and colleagues, to advance social policies which support and enhance social, economic and environmental justice. CO 4: Demonstrate the ability to analyze, formulate, and advocate for policies which advance social well-being. CO 5: Analyze how individual differences and diversity impact the perception and analysis of social welfare policies. Total Points: 150 Due Date Please see the due dates below. The Late Assignment Policy applies to this assignment. Deliverables You are to submit a written paper for grading. Requirements and Guidelines According to the Barusch (2018) text, our criminal justice system is grounded in three concepts – revenge, rehabilitation and deterrence, but rehabilitation is the least explored. Write a 2-3 page paper that describes how a social worker engaged in policy practice could positively impact our criminal justice system by heightening its focus on rehabilitation. Incorporate peer-reviewed academically sound resources and literature to substantiate your ideas. See the Directions and Grading Criteria and the Grading rubric points distribution. The Application Assignment is worth 150 points and will be graded on use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence structure, and overall organization based on the required components as summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric. Create your exercise using Microsoft Word (a part of Microsoft Office), which is the required format for all Chamberlain College documents. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx” Follow the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about your assignment may be posted under the Q & A Forum. The length of the exercise is to be no less than two pages and no greater than three pages excluding title page and reference pages. APA format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required components of the review as Level 1 headings (upper and lower case, centered, boldface). Grading Criteria See the detailed directions and grading criteria in the table below. Category Points Description Integration of historical and contemporary knowledge of the social problem 40 Demonstrate knowledge and use of concepts of the origins of the criminal justice system and how it affects current policy. Integration of historical and contemporary knowledge of the population 40 Demonstrate knowledge and use of concepts disparities that exist in the criminal justice system based on race and class. Integration of social work values 20 Apply social work values to the problem and/or population and how they may differ from policymakers or other stakeholders. Integration of scholarly references 15 Demonstrate knowledge and use of concepts learned from of relevant academic and professional source materials. Only scholarly sources, i.e., peer-reviewed publications, government reports, should be used in this paper. Adherence to assignment instructions 15 Student follows all assignment prompts and instructions. Clarity of Writing 15 Narrative must be well organized with minimal grammatical and/or spelling or punctuation errors. Must adhere to a scholarly and professional writing style. APA Style 5 Paper formatting and reference citations must adhere to the guidelines provided in the American Psychological Association. Total 150 A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. Rubric Social Problem Analysis Paper Grading Rubric Social Problem Analysis Paper Grading Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Description of criterion Understanding of criminal justice system 40.0 pts Highest Level of performance Provides thorough explanation of history’s influence on current criminal justice policies. 35.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance Explanation partially addresses history’s influence on current criminal justice policies. 31.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance Explanation minimally addresses history’s influence on current criminal justice policies. 27.0 pts Failing Level of Performance Provides inadequate or poor explanation of history’s influence on current criminal justice policies. 40.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Knowledge of the problem/population 40.0 pts Highest Level of performance Excellent explanation of how race and class intersect with current policies 35.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance Good explanation of how race and class intersect with current policies 31.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance Incomplete  explanation of how race and class intersect with current policies 0.0 pts Failing Level of Performance Inadequate or no explanation of how race and class intersect with current policies 40.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Social Work Values 20.0 pts Highest Level of performance Excellent explanation of social work values and how they align and/or contradict with values of affected population and stakeholders. 3.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance Good explanation of social work values and how they align and/or contradict with values of affected population and stakeholders. 2.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance Incomplete explanation of social work values and how they align and/or contradict with values of affected population and stakeholders. 0.0 pts Failing Level of Performance Poor or no explanation of social work values and how they align and/or contradict with values of affected population and stakeholders. 20.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Integration of scholarly references 15.0 pts Highest Level of performance Clear evidence of utilizing a variety of references from peer reviewed publications. Shows evidence of having read, reflected on and applied course readings. 13.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance Some evidence of utilizing a variety of references from peer reviewed publications. 11.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance Minimal evidence of utilizing a variety of references from peer reviewed publications. 9.0 pts Failing Level of Performance No evidence of utilizing a variety of references from peer reviewed publications. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Adherence to assignment instructions 15.0 pts Highest Level of performance Excels in response to the assignment prompts.  Demonstrates ability to incorporate content from required and class discussions 13.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance Responds appropriately to  most assignment prompts.  Demonstrates ability to incorporate content from required and class discussions. 11.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance Responds inconsistently to  most assignment prompts, and does not always incorporate content from required and class discussions 9.0 pts Failing Level of Performance Responds poorly or does not adhere to  assignment prompts.  Demonstrates poor or no ability to incorporate content from required and class discussions. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Clarity of Writing 15.0 pts Highest Level of performance Excellent use of standard English showing original thought. No spelling or grammar errors. Well organized with proper flow of meaning. 13.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance Good evidence of own expression and competent use of language. No more than three spelling or grammar errors. Well organized thoughts and concepts. 11.0 pts Acceptable Level of Performance Some evidence of own expression and competent use of language. Four or more spelling or grammar errors. Inconsistencies in thoughts and concepts. 9.0 pts Failing Level of Performance Language needs significant development. Numerous spelling and/or grammar errors; fails to have organized thoughts and concepts. 15.0 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Style 5.0 pts Highest Level of performance APA format correct with no more than 1-2 minor errors. 4.0 pts Very Good or High Level of Performance 3-5 errors in APA format and/or 1-2 citations are missing. 2.9 pts Acceptable Level of Performance APA formatting contains multiple errors and/or several citations are missing. 0.0 pts Failing Level of Performance APA formatting not present and citations are not included. 5.0 pts Total Points: 150.0